Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: add support for TLS 1.0 record encryption

Hi Andy, On 01.08.2014 17:44, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > If I understand it correctly, the issue is that cryptlen depends on > the padding. I added some notes inline above. See here, too: > > https://www.imperialviolet.org/2013/02/04/luckythirteen.html Thanks for review. We'll address this issue

Re: [PATCH -v4] random: introduce getrandom(2) system call

On Thu 2014-07-31 10:06:37, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > On Don, 2014-07-31 at 00:18 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed 2014-07-30 16:40:52, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > > > On Mit, 2014-07-30 at 07:56 -0600, Bob Beck wrote: > > > > Pavel. I have bit 'ol enterprise daemon running with established fi

Re: HELP: IPsec reordering issue

On 07/31/2014 02:23 PM, Herbert Xu wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:07:26AM +0800, Ming Liu wrote: And we've figure out a patch as the attached, the basic idea is just queue the packets if "irq_fpu_usable()" is not usable or if there are already few packets queued for decryption. Else decrypt t