Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Trivial driver changes to remove include plat/cpu.h

2012-10-15 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tony Lindgren [121009 17:21]: > * Péter Ujfalusi [121009 02:03]: > > On 10/08/2012 07:35 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > - omap-dma.c and omap-pcm.c can test the arch locally as > > > omap1 and omap2 cannot be compiled together because of > > > conflicting compiler flags > > > > > sou

Re: [PATCH] crypto: tegra: remove include of

2012-10-15 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/15/2012 08:33 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:17:40PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren >> >> Nothing from this file is used, and the file will hopefully be deleted >> soon. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren > > Acked-by: Herbert Xu Thanks, applied

Re: [PATCH] crypto: tegra: remove include of

2012-10-15 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:17:40PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren > > Nothing from this file is used, and the file will hopefully be deleted > soon. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren Acked-by: Herbert Xu -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herber

Re: [PATCH] crypto: convert to use be16_add_cpu()

2012-10-15 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:52:25PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote: > From: Wei Yongjun > > Convert cpu_to_be16(be16_to_cpu(E1) + E2) to use be16_add_cpu(). > > dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch. > (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch) > > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun Patch applied. -- Em

Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] Optimize CRC32C calculation using PCLMULQDQ in crc32c-intel module

2012-10-15 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:44:14PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote: > Version 2 > This version of the patch series fixes compilation errors for > 32 bit x86 targets. > > Version 1 > This patch series optimized CRC32C calculations with PCLMULQDQ > instruction for crc32c-intel module. It speeds up the origin

Re: [PULL] modules

2012-10-15 Thread Rusty Russell
Linus Torvalds writes: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Rusty Russell wrote: >> >> >> module signing is the highlight, but it's an all-over David Howells frenzy... >> >> ---

Re: FIPS-mode panic? (was Re: [PULL] modules)

2012-10-15 Thread Stephan Mueller
On 15.10.2012 09:50:54, +0200, David Howells wrote: Hi David, > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> Hmm. So this thing makes me wonder: >> >> /* Not having a signature is only an error if we're strict. */ >> if (err < 0 && fips_enabled) >> panic("Module verification fail

FIPS-mode panic? (was Re: [PULL] modules)

2012-10-15 Thread David Howells
Linus Torvalds wrote: > Hmm. So this thing makes me wonder: > > /* Not having a signature is only an error if we're strict. */ > if (err < 0 && fips_enabled) > panic("Module verification failed with error %d in FIPS > mode\n", > err); > > d