On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:46:12PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Is it useless, or is it there to harden against some side-channel
> attack?
When writing this implementation, I first had a different approach with more
data getting read in and I just forgot to delete this instruction
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012, Johannes Goetzfried wrote:
> The register %rdx is written, but never read till the end of the encryption
> routine. Therefore let's delete the useless instruction.
Is it useless, or is it there to harden against some side-channel
attack?
--
"One disk to rule them all, One
The register %rdx is written, but never read till the end of the encryption
routine. Therefore let's delete the useless instruction.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Goetzfried
---
arch/x86/crypto/twofish-avx-x86_64-asm_64.S |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x