On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
wrote:
> Hi Shirish,
>
From: Shirish Pargaonkar
Replace remaining use of md5 hash functions local to cifs module
with kernel crypto APIs.
Remove header and source file containing those local functions.
Hi Shirish,
>>> From: Shirish Pargaonkar
>>>
>>> Replace remaining use of md5 hash functions local to cifs module
>>> with kernel crypto APIs.
>>> Remove header and source file containing those local functions.
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar
>>> ---
>>> fs/cifs/Makefile |
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:04:05 -0600
> shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> From: Shirish Pargaonkar
>>
>> Replace remaining use of md5 hash functions local to cifs module
>> with kernel crypto APIs.
>> Remove header and source file containin
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:04:05 -0600
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Shirish Pargaonkar
>
> Replace remaining use of md5 hash functions local to cifs module
> with kernel crypto APIs.
> Remove header and source file containing those local functions.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargao
From: Shirish Pargaonkar
Replace remaining use of md5 hash functions local to cifs module
with kernel crypto APIs.
Remove header and source file containing those local functions.
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar
---
fs/cifs/Makefile |2 +-
fs/cifs/cifsencrypt.c |1 -
fs/cifs/lin
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:35:17PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:09:50AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > I take your point, but I'm not certain I agree that we are duplicating an
> > existing user interface. A cursory glance would say that we are, but
> > /dev/random and
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:09:50AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> I take your point, but I'm not certain I agree that we are duplicating an
> existing user interface. A cursory glance would say that we are, but
> /dev/random and /dev/urandom really just provide access to the kernels entropy
> pools
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 05:00:05PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 06:34:40PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > Herbert, Sorry to bug you about this, but are you still planning on pulling
> > this
> > now that Linus has the infrastructure scheduled for 2.6.38?
>
> I think it's