On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 04:00:52AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> I'm still busy with the merge window - please dont wait for me and consider
> it
> fixed, i'll re-report if there's still any problems.
OK, I'll apply the patch.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbe
* Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:55:19PM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:50:24AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Herbert Xu wrote:
> > >
> > > > crypto: pcrypt - Add pcrypt crypto parallelization wrapper
> > >
> > > -tip testin
> I've applied your patch.
Great! Thank you!
Best regards,
Szilveszter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Due to optimization a call to memset() may be removed as a dead store when
the buffer is not used after its value is overwritten. The new function
secure_bzero() ensures a section of memory is padded with zeroes.
To prevent a memset() from being eliminated, the compiler must belive
that the memory
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 20:17:04 +
Dimitrios Siganos wrote:
> Dimitrios Siganos wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to write a hmac(sha1) algorithm and I have a few
> > questions. I have a HW crypto accelerator that does the actual crypto
> > work. I have already successfully implemented sha1 by
Dimitrios Siganos wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to write a hmac(sha1) algorithm and I have a few
questions. I have a HW crypto accelerator that does the actual crypto
work. I have already successfully implemented sha1 by creating a
CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_DIGEST algorithm.
1) Can I implement hmac(sha1) as
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:55:19PM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:50:24AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > > crypto: pcrypt - Add pcrypt crypto parallelization wrapper
> >
> > -tip testing started triggering the following freque
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 07:58:40AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:10:49PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, I just noticed that both before and after the patch we're
> > only including the hash request size for the encrypt case, and
> > not the givencrypt case. Is
