This patch is to fix the vmac algorithm, add more test cases for vmac, and fix
the test failure on some big endian system like s390.
Signed-off-by: Shane Wang
crypto/testmgr.h | 64 +++--
crypto/vmac.c| 77 ++---
2
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:05:09PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> This commit fixes my previous patches in the way Herbert Xu asked me to.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Hartmann
I think I wasn't very clear. You should only send incremental
patches for stuff that I have already merged.
As these
This commit fixes my previous patches in the way Herbert Xu asked me to.
Signed-off-by: Richard Hartmann
---
crypto/seed.c |2 +-
crypto/tcrypt.c |4 +-
crypto/wp512.c | 114 +++---
crypto/xcbc.c |4 +-
4 files changed, 62 inserti
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:26:46AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
>
> Another workflow question:
> Does LKML as a whole prefer rebased patches, patches on top of the
> old one or does not one care as long as it's clear what to apply in what
> order?
> Or does everyone have a different opionion, in
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:48, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> In this case, please hold seed, tcrypt, wp512 & xcbc. I will
>> refactor them.
>
> OK.
Another workflow question:
Does LKML as a whole prefer rebased patches, patches on top of the
old one or does not one care as long as it's clear what to appl
