On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 04:20:02PM +0100, roel kluin wrote:
>
> Yes that are the patches, however, I think my previous patch missed one
> blk to cip conversion in geode_setkey_cip():
Please send an incremental patch. Thanks!
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
> * Roel Kluin | 2010-01-29 14:32:56 [+0100]:
>
>>This was already discussed in december/januari but I still cannot find it in
>>mainline, was it lost?
>
> Isn't this patch [0] and [1] in Herbert's tree? If so Herbert is
> probably
* Roel Kluin | 2010-01-29 14:32:56 [+0100]:
>This was already discussed in december/januari but I still cannot find it in
>mainline, was it lost?
Isn't this patch [0] and [1] in Herbert's tree? If so Herbert is
probably going to merge in the next merge window because it is not
urgend enough.
[0]
crypto_cipher cip members were set where crypto_cipher blk members should
have been, also the PTR_ERR of the wrong pointer was returned.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin
---
This was already discussed in december/januari but I still cannot find it in
mainline, was it lost?
diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 08:45:12AM +0200, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1 more question.
>
> >From what context "crypto_completion_t" can be called?
> irq/tasklet/process
> or something else?
tasklet or process with BH off.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herber
