* Evgeniy Polyakov | 2009-03-18 01:42:43 [+0300]:
>Hi.
Hi Evgeniy,
>On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:58:44PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
>(arm-ker...@ml.breakpoint.cc) wrote:
>> +struct crypto_priv {
>
>Please use less generic names over the file.
will do.
>> +void __iomem *reg;
>> +void
* Paulius Zaleckas [2009-03-18 17:55]:
> > +config CRYPTO_DEV_MARVELL_CRYPTO_ENGINE
>
> CRYPTO_DEV...CRYPTO_ENGINE
> Maybe CRYPTO_DEV_MARVELL would be enough?
... and since we're talking about naming issues, I think you should
replace "mav" with "mv" to be in line with other uses inside the
kern
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This is version two of the the driver. New things:
> - aes-ecb passes selftests
> - aes-cbc passes selftests
>
> The driver still does memcpy() from/to sram. To solve this, a dma driver
> would be required but first I wanted to compare the performance between
> n
Hi,
In addition to AES-NI, Intel will provide PCLMULQDQ-NI (carry-less
multiplication) in future CPU to accelerate GCM mode. The document can
be found here:
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/carry-less-multiplication-and-its-usage-for-computing-the-gcm-mode/
It follows the same design as
