On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 01:32:48PM +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
>
> That's right, I confused SHA with AES in PadLock, sorry. With AES the
> first versions required 16-byte alignment on input and output data as
> well as on the control word and there's a flag in newer PadLocks that
> allow doing A
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:55:00PM +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
IIRC The first versions of VIA PadLock required the input data to be
aligned on 16-bytes boundaries and more importantly they always
finalised the hash. Therefore we had to collect all data before hashing
them.
Hm
