From: Jean-Christophe Dubois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:50:16 +0200
> Le Wednesday 13 August 2008 03:16:04 Herbert Xu, vous avez écrit :
> > Jean-Christophe Dubois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Small fix removing an unnecessary intermediate variable.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by
Le Wednesday 13 August 2008 03:16:04 Herbert Xu, vous avez écrit :
> Jean-Christophe Dubois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Small fix removing an unnecessary intermediate variable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Please send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and cc [EM
Jean-Christophe Dubois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Small fix removing an unnecessary intermediate variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and cc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email:
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought we support intel x86 cpus in both 32 and 64bit modes...?
Yes we do, but the original patch had ugly ifdefs that did the
same thing.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Pa
On Fri 2008-08-08 21:35:30, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think you want to use
> >
> > #define SCALE_F sizeof(unsigned long)
>
> Yeah in general that's what we should do. However, this driver
> is specific to Intel x86 CPUs.
I thought we support intel
