* Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger | 2008-06-01 19:16:18 [+0200]:
>This patch fixes the usage of RIPEMD-160 in xfrm_algo which in turn
>allows hmac(rmd160) to be used as authentication mechanism in IPsec
>ESP and AH (see RFC 2857).
>
>Signed-off-by: Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>---
> net/xfrm
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 07:16:18PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> This patch fixes the usage of RIPEMD-160 in xfrm_algo which in turn
> allows hmac(rmd160) to be used as authentication mechanism in IPsec
> ESP and AH (see RFC 2857).
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:43:46AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 06:09:46PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> >> Neil Horman wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:10:14AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
>
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 06:09:46PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
>> Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:10:14AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
Neil Horman wrote:
[snip]
These tests both seem to fail on my machine. Did you verify that the tes
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 06:09:46PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:10:14AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> >> Neil Horman wrote:
> >>> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:06:25AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Could you document the source of
This patch makes HMAC-RIPEMD-160 usable with IPsec/XFRM.
Since I have no IPsec test setup the patch has not (yet) been tested with
IPsec and is thus marked as RFC. I will put together a test environment which
will take some time. In the meantime it would be great if somebody who already
has a work
This patch fixes the usage of RIPEMD-160 in xfrm_algo which in turn
allows hmac(rmd160) to be used as authentication mechanism in IPsec
ESP and AH (see RFC 2857).
Signed-off-by: Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 de
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:44:23AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
>> Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:46:22AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rüegsegger wrote:
> I was wondering why you created your o
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:10:14AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
>> Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:06:25AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Could you document the source of these vectors in the patch
description please?
>>> Sure, reposting
>>>
>>> Pa
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:10:14AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:06:25AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> Could you document the source of these vectors in the patch
> >> description please?
> >
> > Sure, reposting
> >
> > Patch to add check
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:44:23AM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:46:22AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rüegsegger wrote:
> >>> I was wondering why you created your own test vectors. Would
11 matches
Mail list logo