Neil Horman wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:46:22AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rüegsegger wrote:
>>> I was wondering why you created your own test vectors. Wouldn't
>>> standardized test vectors by NIST or ANSI be preferable?
>> If you coul
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:06:25AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> Could you document the source of these vectors in the patch
>> description please?
>
> Sure, reposting
>
> Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-140-2
> compliance mandates that any sup
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:46:22AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Adrian-Ken Rüegsegger wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering why you created your own test vectors. Wouldn't
> > standardized test vectors by NIST or ANSI be preferable?
>
> If you could post a patch
Hi.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 05:19:30PM -0500, Kim Phillips ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> ok, I see what you are saying now; if a channel gets done during
> talitos_done processing, it'll trigger an interrupt and reset
> priv->status, leaving the tasklet in the dark as to which channel has
> done s