Re: [PATCH] tcrypt: add self test for des3_ebe cipher operating in cbc mode

2008-05-23 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:34:58PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Patch applied. Thanks a lot Neil! -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Ke

Re: [PATCH] tcrypt: add self test for des3_ebe cipher operating in cbc mode

2008-05-23 Thread Neil Horman
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:06:25AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > Could you document the source of these vectors in the patch > description please? Sure, reposting Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-140-2 compliance mandates that any supported mode of operation must inc

Re: [PATCH] tcrypt: add self test for des3_ebe cipher operating in cbc mode

2008-05-23 Thread Herbert Xu
Hi Neil: On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 04:18:55PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-1402-2 > compliance mandates that any supported mode of oepration must include a self > test. This satisfies that requirement for cbc(des_ebe). Tested successf

Re: [dm-devel] Desynchronizing dm-raid1

2008-05-23 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:59:33AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > If you want to negate the meaning of the flag, then you have to write it > yourself. I, as non-developer of crypto code, can prove that on given path > the input data are read only once --- but I can't prove that on all paths >

[PATCH] tcrypt: add self test for des3_ebe cipher operating in cbc mode

2008-05-23 Thread Neil Horman
Patch to add checking of DES3 test vectors using CBC mode. FIPS-1402-2 compliance mandates that any supported mode of oepration must include a self test. This satisfies that requirement for cbc(des_ebe). Tested successfully by me Regards Neil Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tc

Re: [dm-devel] Desynchronizing dm-raid1

2008-05-23 Thread Mikulas Patocka
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 08:32:45AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: There may be external modules. Sorry but we don't support external modules. They should be merged upstream rather than distributed in the wild. Cheers, If you want to negate the meaning of the flag, then you have to write it