* Herbert Xu | 2007-09-20 08:20:58 [+0800]:
>So that the generic C version can actually be tested on x86.
>We don't want it to bit-rot which would make non-x86 2nd-class
>citizens.
Okey. I try to post something what you might like in the new few days.
>Cheers,
Sebastian
-
To unsubscribe from th
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:51:15PM -0500, Joy Latten wrote:
>
> predictability into my sessions? I could truncate the salt
> in my counter block to 2 bytes and put 2 bytes of the IV for
> blocksizes of 8... does that sound, ok?
> Or am I totally misunderstanding it all?
I suggest that you make the
