On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 11:53:13PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Herbert: I need to instances of AES, did I do that correctly?
Yep it's perfect.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~he
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:57:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'd rather tell the compiler what I want than to introduce a new local
> variable and a conditional branch in the hope that the compiler will
> optimize it away, just to avoid a goto.
Yes this code looks OK to me.
Cheers,
--
XTS currently considered to be the successor of the LRW mode by the IEEE1619
workgroup. LRW was discarded, because it was not secure if the encyption key
itself is encrypted with LRW.
XTS does not have this problem. The implementation is pretty straightforward,
a new function was added to gf128mul
Hello Sebastian,
Thanks for your review of the patch. I will address your points below.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:29:06AM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> >diff --git a/crypto/xts.c b/crypto/xts.c
> [...]
> >+/* key consists of keys of equal size concatenated, therefore
> >+ * the lengt
