On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 02:52:34AM +0200, Frederik Sdun wrote:
>
> this removes the the ? operator which is false nearly all the time.
These changes look good. Could you please resend them as
patches that can be directly applied and add a sign-off?
You can refer to Documentation/SubmittingPatche
Hi,
this removes the the ? operator which is false nearly all the time.
--- aes.c.orig 2007-07-15 11:43:21.0 +0200
+++ aes.c 2007-07-16 01:56:49.0 +0200
@@ -156,9 +156,12 @@
p = (p << 1) ^ (p & 0x80 ? 0x01b : 0);
}
+
+ sbx_tab[0] = 0x63;
+
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:15:57 +0800
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 11:48:39PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > Herbert can you contact the async_tx author to make sure that
> > his crypto/ bits go through you in the future so that conflicts
> > like this can be avoi
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 11:48:39PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> I merged this into my net-2.6 tree, there was a tiny conflict
> in crypto/Kconfig I had to resolve because of the async_tx
> stuff that went in upstream.
Thanks!
> Herbert can you contact the async_tx author to make sure that
> his
Hardware drivers shouldn't default to m.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/crypto/Kconfig |5 -
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/drivers/crypto/Kconfig.old 2007-07-14
06:25:27.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/drivers/crypto/K
