On 6/26/07, Alexander Wuerstlein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Nope. I unluckily wrote 'userspace' where I should have said something else:
Chain-of-trust is handled in what I would label 'Adminspace' (Where we do the
signing as in points 1 and 2). There is a very small number of signatures (i
On 070626 01:56, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/25/07, Alexander Wuerstlein
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 070622 21:40, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > [...]
>> We decided against
>> altering the file itself for that and some other reasons.
>> The limitation to s
On 6/25/07, Alexander Wuerstlein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 070622 21:40, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> But first: Have you checked the digsig project? It's been doing
> (for some time) what your current patchset proposes -- and
> it uses public key cryptosystems for the k
I have been reading IP Encapsulating Payload-(ESP) RFC4303 where use of
combined mode algorithms are mentioned and accommodated for.
In trying to determine how I should handle this, I examined the
crypto code and could not readily recognize any combined mode
algorithms. Are there any current plans
