Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 8 2007 17:42, Benjamin Gilbert wrote:
@@ -0,0 +1,299 @@
+/*
+ * x86-optimized SHA1 hash algorithm (i486 and above)
+ *
+ * Originally from Nettle
+ * Ported from M4 to cpp by Benjamin Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2004, Niels M?ller
+ * Copyright
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Matt Mackall wrote:
Have you benchmarked this against lib/sha1.c? Please post the results.
Until then, I'm frankly skeptical that your unrolled version is faster
because when I introduced lib/sha1.c the rolled version therein won by
a significant margin and had 1/10th the cach
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 04:23:27PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:42:53PM -0400, Benjamin Gilbert wrote:
> >>Add x86-optimized implementation of the SHA-1 hash function, taken from
> >>Nettle under the LGPL. This code will be enabled on kernels compil
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:42:53PM -0400, Benjamin Gilbert wrote:
Add x86-optimized implementation of the SHA-1 hash function, taken from
Nettle under the LGPL. This code will be enabled on kernels compiled for
486es or better; kernels which support 386es will use the generi
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:42:53PM -0400, Benjamin Gilbert wrote:
> Add x86-optimized implementation of the SHA-1 hash function, taken from
> Nettle under the LGPL. This code will be enabled on kernels compiled for
> 486es or better; kernels which support 386es will use the generic
> implementatio
On Jun 8 2007 17:42, Benjamin Gilbert wrote:
>@@ -0,0 +1,299 @@
>+/*
>+ * x86-optimized SHA1 hash algorithm (i486 and above)
>+ *
>+ * Originally from Nettle
>+ * Ported from M4 to cpp by Benjamin Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>+ *
>+ * Copyright (C) 2004, Niels M?ller
>+ * Copyright (C) 2006-2007
