On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 10:17:39PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Did you try my patch: [PATCH] adding speed_test_template for lrw(aes)
> which I sent on Sep 23?
Aha, that got buried in my mailbox. I'll push it out soon.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert
Hello Herbert,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 08:13:40AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > It's OK. The source will be more maintainable, but constantly converting
> > between big and little-endian (on little endian machines) may have a
> > significant performance impact (I will just test when your gf128 hits
Hi Rik:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It's OK. The source will be more maintainable, but constantly converting
> between big and little-endian (on little endian machines) may have a
> significant performance impact (I will just test when your gf128 hits
> cryptodev-2.6, and complain if it is the c
Hello Herbert,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 10:56:07AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 03:00:25AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Sorry it took so long. But I've been trying to modify the code so
> that the same source is used for both BE and LE machines. I've
> finally accumul