On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:19:14AM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
>
> No - but they can run with preempt turned on - so there's always the
> risk that we can have two processes in the code at the same time.
preempt_disable should take care of both cases.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.ope
On 06/06/06 11:24 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Jordan Crouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Is there any way to differentiate if a crypto API call was made in an
> > atomic context or not? The problem here, is that I only have one engine,
> > so I need to protect it from multiple processes acces
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:11:17AM -0600, Jordan Crouse ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On 03/06/06 14:53 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> > > +static inline void AWRITE(unsigned long val, unsigned short reg) {
> > > +#ifdef DEBUG
> > > + printk("[AES] W [%x]=%x\n", reg, val);
> > > +#endif
> > >
