Joachim Fritschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch adds the twofish i586 assembler routine.
What performance impact does this have on a variety of machines? Is twofish
used enough for this to be relevant?
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento d
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sunday 04 June 2006 15:16, Joachim Fritschi wrote:
>> This patch adds the twofish x86_64 assembler routine.
>> +/* Defining a few register aliases for better reading */
>
> Maybe you can read it now better, but for everybody else it is extremly
> confusing. It would be bet
On Sunday 04 June 2006 15:16, Joachim Fritschi wrote:
> This patch adds the twofish x86_64 assembler routine.
>
> Changes since last version:
> - The keysetup is now handled by the twofish_common.c (see patch 1 )
> - The last round of the encrypt/decrypt routines where optimized saving 5
> instruct
This patch adds the twofish i586 assembler routine.
Changes since the last version:
- The keysetup is now handled by the twofish_common.c (see patch 1 )
Correctness was verified with the tcrypt module and automated test scripts.
Signed-off-by: Joachim Fritschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -uprN li
This patch adds the twofish x86_64 assembler routine.
Changes since last version:
- The keysetup is now handled by the twofish_common.c (see patch 1 )
- The last round of the encrypt/decrypt routines where optimized saving 5
instructions.
Correctness was verified with the tcrypt module and aut
This patch adds a proper driver name and priority to the generic c
implemtation to allow coexistance of c and assembler modules.
Signed-off-by: Joachim Fritschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -uprN linux-2.6.17-rc5.twofish/crypto/twofish_c.c
linux-2.6.17-rc5.twofish2/crypto/twofish_c.c
--- linux-2.6.
