[ACTIVITY] 11-15 March 2013

bugs on armel) upstream. * binutils: Committed a fix for ARM EABI tests upstream. * Lots of admin stuff. == Plan == * Get binutils testsuite green in a native configuration (fix LP #812276). * Investigate getting binutils testuite automated via cbuild/Lava. * More bugs... -- Will Newton

Testing binutils natively

there was a Connect session about that?). Thanks, -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 13

check in cbuild/LAVA. * Get newlib memcpy patch committed. * Investigate testing memcpy on big endian (qemu user, models?). * IFUNC... -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http

[ACTIVITY] Week 14

== Progress == * Short week (2 days) * Tested memcpy on big endian. * Updated newlib memcpy patch. * More digging into glibc IFUNC. == Issues == * None. == Plan == * Try and get newlib mempcy patch accepted. * IFUNC... -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

cbuild binutils job

wish to formally support gold and fix the broken make check. Does anybody have any objections to doing that? Thanks, -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http

[ACTIVITY] Week 15

. * Submit memcpy IFUNC patch to glibc list. * Get binutils tests into cbuild. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 16

. == Plan == * Submit a patch for binutils testsuite failure on precise. * Complete work on glibc memcpy iFUNC patch. * Follow up binutils IFUNC patch. * AArch64 IFUNC next... -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list

[ACTIVITY] Week 17

blocked on upstream review, 1 blocked on Android team. == Plan == * Should get binutils IFUNC patch committed Monday. * Need to ping other patches again. * More work on AArch64 IFUNC. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 18

-strings. * AArch64 IFUNC code and tests beginning to take shape. == Issues == * None. == Plan == * Another respin of glibc memcpy patch (last one?). * More work on AArch64 IFUNC. * May get time to look into gdb bug Peter found. * 4 day week due to bank holiday. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working

[ACTIVITY] Week 19

be doing much building at the moment. == Plan == * Complete AArch64 IFUNC support and submit a patch. * Look further at gdb bug if I get time. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain

Re: hot spot on the vsub.f32 instruction

might be worth looking into prefetching the data, either manually or maybe try -fprefetch-loop-arrays? -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 20

memcpy. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 21

memcpy problem on Galaxy Nexus. == Issues == * binutils make ; make check takes over 24 hours on foundation model! == Plan == * Respin AArch64 IFUNC binutils patch once relocation number allocated. * Setup git mirrors for binutils, glibc and newlib. * Android memcpy issue. -- Will Newton

[ACTIVITY] Week 22

aarch64-elf testsuite issues with AArch64 ifunc patch. * Investigated glibc malloc and alternatives. == Issues == * None. == Plan == * Submit new AArch64 ifunc patch after testing complete. * Finish getting git mirrors setup. * Look at some gdb testsuite failures. -- Will Newton Toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 23

ther gdb testsuite fixes. * Some research into malloc. == Issues == * None. == Plan == * Create release branches for libraries & tools and improve docs. * More gdb fixes. * More malloc reading. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro __

[ANNOUNCE] Linaro eglibc 2.17 2013.06 released

` * Questions? [ask Linaro](http://ask.linaro.org/). * Interested in commercial support? inquire at [Linaro support](mailto:supp...@linaro.org) -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain

[ANNOUNCE] Linaro newlib 2.0.0 2013.06 released

Linaro](http://ask.linaro.org/). * Interested in commercial support? inquire at [Linaro support](mailto:supp...@linaro.org) -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http

[ANNOUNCE] Linaro binutils 2.23.2 2013.06 released

` * Questions? [ask Linaro](http://ask.linaro.org/). * Interested in commercial support? inquire at [Linaro support](mailto:supp...@linaro.org) -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 24

== * None. == Plan == * Fix AArch64 ifunc issue. * Fix gdb.thread issue. * strlen -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Re: [Buildroot] Bizarre behavior of armeb toolchain

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > I'm facing a bizarre problem with an armeb toolchain built by > Buildroot. I'm also posting this to the crossgcc@ list since there are > some gcc/binutils experts out there. > > First, a little bit of background. ARM Big Endian

[ACTIVITY] Week 25

benchmarks. * gerrit review of memcpy change ongoing. == Issues == * None. == Plan == * Reproduce AArch64 ifunc issue. * Resolve gerrit memcpy review if possible. * Start work on malloc test and benchmark framework. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

[ACTIVITY] Week 26

cortex-strings and newlib for review. == Issues == * None. == Plan == * Prepare for Connect. * Resubmit memcpy to gerrit as requested. * Respin AArch64 ifunc patches against latest head. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro

Re: Overheating Pandas

when the bot > passes 90%, it shuts itself off. It may also be worth examining your power supplies and see if they are providing enough current to run the chip this hot reliably. A bench supply could eliminate this possibility conclusively. -- Will Newton Too

[ACTIVITY] Week 27

. * Preparation for Connect. == Issues == * None. == Plan == * Connect all week -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro

[ACTIVITY] Week 29

testsuite patch (my gdb patch queue now empty) * Committed two of Omair's gdb patches == Issues == * None. == Plan == * Produce some malloc benchmark graphs * Progress the stack guard work * Start writing some malloc code -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, L

[ANNOUNCE] Linaro eglibc 2.17 2013.07-2 released.

://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain) * Linaro Toolchain IRC channel on irc.freenode.net at `#linaro-tcwg` * Questions? [ask Linaro](http://ask.linaro.org/). * Interested in commercial support? inquire at [Linaro support](mailto:supp...@linaro.org) -- Will Newton Toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 30

, reading etc. * Started work on malloc code. * Booked flights for LCU13! == Issues == * None. == Plan == * Deal with any test feedback on IFUNC patches. * malloc -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro

[ACTIVITY] Week 31

== Progress == * 4 day week (Friday off) * Improve malloc benchmarking further. * Writing and reading malloc code == Issues == * None. == Plan == * Possible eglibc 2.18 release * Possible gdb release * More malloc -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

[ACTIVITY] Week 32

malloc implementation functionally complete -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 33

functionally complete -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 34

== * Further malloc work * Get glibc patches applied upstream * Complete wiki cleanup -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro

Re: Any plans for "ifunc-ing" more glibc routines?

rchitectural details (although you could in theory extract this information in the resolver if it is easily accessible in userspace). -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Re: backport of memcpy ifunc work to 2.17

1130a2dde6359e3709b7e318e9d88a It's not an upstream commit but fixes up the merge in a pragmatic manner. ;-) -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Re: Any plans for "ifunc-ing" more glibc routines?

from > my area of expertise :-) Not using the HWCAP bits. It may be possible to pull the information out of a register somewhere, but AFAIK it's privilege protected so not possible from userspace. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 35

* Committed strlen code to glibc == Issues == * None == Plan == * Get glibc patches applied upstream * More malloc * Look into stack guard and pointer guard stuff for ARM -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list

[ANNOUNCE] Linaro eglibc 2.18 2013.09 released.

://ask.linaro.org/). * Interested in commercial support? inquire at [Linaro support](mailto:supp...@linaro.org) -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman

[ACTIVITY] Week 36

possible * Get back to malloc and stack guard work -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 37

== Plan == * Visit Linaro in Cambridge from Tuesday to Thursday (see you there!) * Submit glibc malloc benchmark * Get benchmark numbers for tweaked memcpy * Start glibc pointer guard work -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 38

glibc ARM pointer guard work == Issues == * None == Plan == * gdb 2013.09 release * Various small items arising out of meetings last week * Complete glibc ARM pointer guard -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing

[ANNOUNCE] Linaro gdb 7.6.1 2013.09-1 released

://ask.linaro.org/). * Interested in commercial support? inquire at [Linaro support](mailto:supp...@linaro.org) -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org

[ACTIVITY] Week 39

little bit of time on malloc * Built office furniture! == Issues == * None == Plan == * Finish off pointer guard * Hopefully back to malloc -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 40

AArch64 GOT layout patches. == Issues == * None == Plan == * Backports for 2013.10 * Follow up qemu patch * malloc -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http

Re: Does Linaro aarch64 gcc toolchain support Cortex-A53/A57 performance tunning.

t; Error: unknown cpu `cortex-a53' > Error: unrecognized option -mcpu=cortex-a53 I believe this is an assembler error, as the assembler only supports these CPU types on binutils trunk. Have you tried passing -mtune=cortex-a53 instead? -- Will Newton To

[ACTIVITY] Week 41

malloc -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ANNOUNCE] Linaro eglibc 2.18 2013.10 released

://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain) * Linaro Toolchain IRC channel on irc.freenode.net at `#linaro-tcwg` * Questions? [ask Linaro](http://ask.linaro.org/). * Interested in commercial support? inquire at [Linaro support](mailto:supp...@linaro.org) -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group

[ANNOUNCE] Linaro binutils 2.23.2 2013.10-4 released

` * Questions? [ask Linaro](http://ask.linaro.org/). * Interested in commercial support? inquire at [Linaro support](mailto:supp...@linaro.org) -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 42

== Progress == * Relased gdb 7.6.1 2013.10 * Respin of qemu VSEL patches * Bug fixing and performance measurement on malloc == Issues == * None == Plan == * Refactor malloc to improve performance * Prepare for Connect -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

[ACTIVITY] Week 43

== Progress == * Ongoing refactoring of malloc to improve performance * Preparation for Connect == Issues == * None == Plan == * Linaro Connect US -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain

[ANNOUNCE] Linaro newlib 2.0.0 2013.11 released

-tcwg` * Questions? [ask Linaro](http://ask.linaro.org/). * Interested in commercial support? inquire at [Linaro support](mailto:supp...@linaro.org) -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 45

glibc memory manual and aligned_alloc patches * malloc -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 46

e gdb hardware breakpoint issue -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] Week 47

Wednesday afternoon == Plan == * Respin and submit glibc docs patches * Submit glibc aarch64 ifunc code -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman

[ACTIVITY] Week 48

== * None == Plan == * aarch64 qemu * UK Memory Management Network Workshop on Friday -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro

[ACTIVITY] Week 49

== Progress == * Rework QEMU AArch32 ARMv8 patches (3/10, TCWG-47, TCWG-48) * Further work on QEMU AArch64 FP patches (5/10, VIRT-183) * UK Memory Management Network Workshop on Friday (2/10) == Issues == * None == Plan == * More QEMU AArch64 FP -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group

Re: segfault using __thread variable

55807568 > x290x7fe4d0 549755806928 > x300x4b4ed4 4935380 > sp 0x7fe4d0 0x7fe4d0 > pc 0x4b4b90 0x4b4b90 > std::char_traits, std::allocator > > >::get() const+36> > cpsr 0x2000 5

Re: segfault using __thread variable

On 12 December 2013 21:02, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the respsonse. > > Will Newton writes: > >> On 12 December 2013 08:00, Michael Hudson-Doyle >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have a bit of a strange one. I

Re: segfault using __thread variable

On 12 December 2013 21:59, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Will Newton writes: > >> On 12 December 2013 21:02, Michael Hudson-Doyle >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks for the respsonse. >>> >>> Will Newton writes: >>> >&g

Re: segfault using __thread variable

On 12 December 2013 23:14, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Will Newton writes: > >> On 12 December 2013 21:59, Michael Hudson-Doyle >> wrote: >>> Will Newton writes: > > [snp] > >>>> I would guess that 0x64c000 is the base of the GOT and 776

[ACTIVITY] Week 50

day week next week then off until Jan 8th * Wrap up qemu work to a good state to handover -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro

Re: segfault using __thread variable

aarch64 ld backend) but was intended to be fixed by the rework of the same code in 1419bbe5712af8a43f1d63feb32687649563426d. However I was never actually able to reproduce the failure case (I saw binaries that were broken so I know it could happen) so the fix was somewhat speculative. Hence I am

Re: segfault using __thread variable

On 17 December 2013 07:53, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Michael Hudson-Doyle writes: > >> Michael Hudson-Doyle writes: >> >>> Will Newton writes: >>> >>>> On 16 December 2013 03:36, Michael Hudson-Doyle >>>> wrote: >>>

[ACTIVITY] Week 51

! -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Re: help on linaro android toolchain 13.12 (arm-v7)

lation unit where the reference is). Usually the cause is either an assembly coding error or some code being built without -fPIC. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Re: -Bsymbolic breaks PMF comparison under ARM

the > comparison failing inside of Qt shared libraries is breaking code on ARM, as > -Bsymbolic is set by default there.) Thanks for the report and testcase. The attached patch to ld may help. I am not yet sure whether or not it is the correct approach but if it works for you that would be int

[ACTIVITY] Week 1

* Hopefully push glibc ARM pointer encryption fix for 2.19 -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Re: ICE when building linux-linaro-tracking

l probably need to attached patch as well since some of the >> linaro patches break namespace support :( I believe the kernel build system can get you the pre-processed source with, e.g.: # make lib/raid6/neon4.i -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Re: -Bsymbolic breaks PMF comparison under ARM

On 16 January 2014 10:04, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > Hello Will, > > Il 10/01/2014 15:50, Will Newton ha scritto: >> >> Thanks for the report and testcase. >> >> >> The attached patch to ld may help. I am not yet sure whether or not it >> is the c

[ACTIVITY] 13 - 17 January 2014

mplete outstanding QEMU work * ARM setjmp/longjmp SystemTap probes * malloc -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] 20 - 24 January 2014

WG-378) * Ported Python cffi package to AArch64, submitted upstream (1/10) * Fixed bug building glibc for armv4 (1/10) == Issues == * Broadband down for 3 hours on Wednesday afternoon == Plan == * Follow up QEMU patches and maybe post v2 * malloc -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group,

[ACTIVITY] 27 - 31 January 2014

setjmp/longjmp changes * malloc benchmarking and improvements -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Re: systemtap test suite compilation failed: runtime/vma.c :133:21: error: pointer targets in initialization differ in signedness

l has lots of these errors, but disables the warning explicitly: # disable pointer signed / unsigned warnings in gcc 4.0 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, pointer-sign) -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] 3 -7 February 2014

benchmark graphing script * newlib release * gdb 7.7 release (build an rc to troubleshoot releasing from git) -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org

[ACTIVITY] 10 - 14 February 2014

== * QEMU CRC instructions * Finalize slides for Connect * malloc -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] 17 - 21 February 2014

work * Preparation for Connect -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] 24 - 28 February 2014

== Progress == * 3 day week (off Monday and travelling Friday) * QEMU ARMv8 CRC instructions (2/10, TCWG-52) * Slides for Connect (3/10) * Investigating AArch64 setcontext issue (1/10, TCWG-410) == Issues == * None == Plan == * LCA14 -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

Re: Trouble executing ARM code on linaro toolchain

opriate value, set arm mode and function type of sTestArnDale symbol) -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro test_arndale.s Description: Binary data ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Re: linking AArch64 ELF image with aarch64-linux-gnu-ld yields RELASZ = 0

; __pthread_key_create + 0 > > ... > > ^^...note the __pthread_key_create relocation I am interested in... > > I would expect the RELASZ in the dynamic section to be 0x2058 instead of 0. > > Any tips to what could be wrong? I can't see any obvious way this could hap

Re: build errors

IG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE > > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Os $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,) > > else > > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O0 It is not possible to build the kernel with -O0 due to various requirements for inlining and register allocation. You could try -O1 or -Og (if your compi

[ACTIVITY] 10 - 14 March 2014

== Plan == * Resolve eglibc mirror situation -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] 17 - 21 March 2014

graphing script * Holiday on Friday == Issues == * Couple of hours power outage on Monday == Plan == * Get outstanding glibc and binutils patches committed * Reorganise JIRA cards for malloc work * glibc benchmarking -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

[ACTIVITY] 24 - 28 March 2014

) * Investigate a couple of issues raised by member services and on lists (2/10) == Issues == * None == Plan == * Resurrect glibc malloc benchtest * More glibc benchmark infrastructure work * Check status of glibc ARM port build warnings -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

[ACTIVITY] 1 - 4 April 2014

microbenchmark (2/10, TCWG-160) * Various small binutils and glibc patches (1/10) == Issues == * None == Plan == * Submit patch for glibc malloc microbenchmark -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro

Re: objdump missing source lines

t. For example if you run arm-linux-gnueabihf-readelf --debug-dump on the object and look for DW_AT_comp_dir it should show you where objdump will look for source files by default. You can manipulate this path with the --prefix and --prefix-strip options if your source code is in a different path. --

[ACTIVITY] 7 - 11 April 2014

) == Issues == * None == Plan == * More glibc and malloc microbenchmark work * malloc macro benchmark planning -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org

[ACTIVITY] 14 - 18 April 2014

, etc. (1/10) == Issues == * None == Plan == * malloc benchmarking/implementation work -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro

[ACTIVITY] 21 - 25 April 2014

-benchmarks for malloc (1/10, TCWG-441) * Investigate glibc single-thread optimization (1/10, TCWG-436) == Issues == * None == Plan == * Further work on glibc single-thread optimization * More malloc macro-benchmark stuff -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

[ACTIVITY] 28 April - 2 May 2014

== Plan == * Various bits of patch followup * More malloc macro-benchmark work * See how single thread optimization discussion goes * glibc benchmark graphing? -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro

[ACTIVITY] 5 - 9 May 2014

== * Develop a good general way to measure memory usage of complex applications -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] 12 - 16 May 2014

memory usage (4/10, TCWG-441) * Trying to get NX working on Fedora 20 (1/10) == Issues == * None == Plan == * Get postgresql and hopefully others working with new benchmark setup * Figure out how to make NX work -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

[ACTIVITY] 19 - 23 May 2014

failures on aarch64 (2/10) * Meetings, admin (1/10) == Issues == * None == Plan == * More malloc application benchmarking -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http

Re: [ACTIVITY] Week 21

binutils/linaro-2.24.0-2014.03 to > binutils/linaro-2.24.0-2014.05. > > == Plans == > > * Push pending patches. > > == Planed leaves == > > * June. 2. > > ___ > linaro-toolchain mailing list > linaro-toolchain@list

[ACTIVITY] 26 - 30 May 2014

refactoring malloc microbenchmark * Work on results plotting code for benchmarks -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] 2 - 6 May 2014

running for validation * More malloc benchmarking -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] 9 - 13 June 2014

by Maxim (1/10) * Patch review and followup (1/10) * Meetings, admin (1/10) == Issues == * None == Plan == * Ubuntu on wg? * Resubmit malloc microbenchmark * Rework postgresql benchmark to use unix domain sockets -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

Re: Reg. Error during binutils build

Is that on cards for backport? I'll backport it for 2014.07. It may be possible to work around this by passing --disable-werror to the configure script. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing li

[ACTIVITY] 16 - 20 June 2014

Friday (2/10) * Still no luck on getting Ubuntu on wg boards == Issues == * None == Plan == * Make sure we have everything we need for glibc freeze at month end * malloc app benchmark work -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro

Re: VFP in BE mode - undefined instruction vstmia

hain/binaries/gcc-linaro-armeb-linux-gnueabihf-4.8-2014.04_linux.tar.xz The instruction is valid and encoded correctly as far as I can tell. I would suspect that this exception may be related to the kernel VFP handling code. -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] 23 - 27 June 2014

glibc, binutils and gdb (1/10) * Investigated language runtimes (1/10) * Meetings (1/10) == Issues == * None == Plan == * More glibc patch work for the freeze (1st July) * malloc benchmarking -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro

[ACTIVITY] 30 June - 4 July 2014

bugzilla/JIRA/upstream * malloc benchmarking * glibc patches -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

[ACTIVITY] 7 - 11 July 2014

/10) * Get binutils ARM testsuite all passing on EABI, mostly on OABI (2/10) * glibc patch review and build warning fixes (2/10, CARD-341) * Annual leave on Friday (2/10) == Issues == * None == Plan == * 4 days in Berlin * Travel to Cauldron -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

  1   2   >