Dear all,
we have an ARM Cortex-A8 board where we are running our application. I am in
charge of maintaining the Linux on it and the toolchain/SDK setup. So far we've
been running Poky/OpenEmbedded and using the cross compiler that came about
during the compilation.
For easier maintenance, we
Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 28 October 2012 18:08, "Frank Müller" wrote:
> > For easier maintenance, we are now switching to Linaro. The image is set
> up and I can compile, however I notice a peculiar fact: the binary
> distribution of Linaro's gcc
> (https
Hi
Michael Hope
> On 30 October 2012 22:11, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> > On 29 October 2012 16:28, "Frank Müller" wrote:
> >> Mans Rullgard wrote:
> >>> On 28 October 2012 18:08, "Frank Müller" wrote:
> >>> > For easier maintenance
st, maybe you could offer some insight
what the main difference is?
May binutil versions and whether eglibc/glibc/uclibc was used play into it?
Frank
"Frank Müller"
> Michael Hope
> > On 30 October 2012 22:11, Mans Rullgard
> wrote:
> > > On 29 October 2
Hi,
Michael Hope :
> With our configuration, crosstool-NG sets CFLAGS to -pipe
> -fno-stack-protector -U_FORTIFY. This overrides the default -O2 -g
> for later stages and gives us an unoptimised GCC.
>
> The test build has just come in. Before:
>
> michaelh@crucis:$ time arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
