Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 6 regressions after gcc commit: basepoints/gcc-14-3331-gcddc26e0274 aarch64: Fine-grained ldp and stp policies with test-cases.

2023-08-28 Thread Manos Anagnostakis
Sorry, forgot cc. On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 10:24 PM Manos Anagnostakis < manos.anagnosta...@vrull.eu> wrote: > Hello Maxim, > > I've found out why this happens. It is a test problem having to do with > -mcpu and should be trivial to address. I should have followed up with a V2 > by next week. > >

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 10 regressions after gcc commit: 5 commits in gcc

2023-08-28 Thread Julian Brown
On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 10:47:45 +0400 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > Hi Julian, > > Your patch series causes regressions on aarch64-linux-gnu. Would you > please investigate? > > Let me know if you need any assistance in reproducing these. Hi Maxim! I'm a little confused -- to be clear, those patches

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 2 regressions after gcc commit 27de9aa152141e7f3ee66372647d0f2cd94c4b90

2023-08-28 Thread Adhemerval Zanella Netto
Hi Richard, Your patch caused a regression [1] on aarch64-linux-gnu. Would you please investigate? I did a quick analysis and it seems that for test_copy_lane_f32, test_copy_lane_s32, test_copy_lane_u32, gcc is now generating zip1 instead of a ins; which does not seem fully correct. Let me know

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 2 regressions after gcc commit 27de9aa152141e7f3ee66372647d0f2cd94c4b90

2023-08-28 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Your patch caused a regression [1] on aarch64-linux-gnu. Would you > please investigate? I did a quick analysis and it seems that for > test_copy_lane_f32, test_copy_lane_s32, test_copy_lane_u32, gcc > is now generating zip1