[ACTIVITY] Week 02

== Progress == o LLVM * TCWG-1324 (failures of Clang::atomic_ops.c and frem.ll on armv8l host): - Fix committed in mainline as r322098 * Bugzilla 33011 (MVN instruction "Upredictable" bit patterns incorrect): - Fix submitted upstream * Buildbots babysitting. * LLVM scripts r

Re: About "__sync_fetch_and_add_4"//Re: [update]: Does linaro toolchain support c++11 ??

On 14 January 2018 at 02:50, zhangwentao (M) wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > Thanks for your reply. > > Actually I use ' -march=armv8-a ', and 'arm-eabi-arm' complier, after > adding this flag, the test case compile passed. (THANKS again) > > But, now I am using some third party libs, and added '

[ACTIVITY] 08 - - 12 Jan 2018

# Progress # * GDB 8.1 release. 8.1 RC was created. 8.1 will be released soon, I think. * GDB is confused by the line table generated by GCC with -gcolumn-info PR 22531. [3/5] Get a working patch, but need to upstream my refactoring first. Other two people from upstream are also changi

[ACTIVITY] Weekly report for week 1 & 2

Hi everyone, Note 1: Working on Linaro 50% time. Note 2: had afternoons off for the first 2 weeks of January == Progress == * Week 1 (2/1 -> 5/1) working for Arm * Fix poor screen resolution issue * Onboarding process: + read all docs, setup accounts (gmail, octopus, ...) * PR35157 / TCWG-1308

res: About "__sync_fetch_and_add_4"//Re: [update]: Does linaro toolchain support c++11 ??

Hi Christophe I compile my APP with Android NDK (c++ 11) and linking libs from NDK packet. I don't know what's does it mean by "pre-built" third party build. And more: I found that our compiler provide __sync_val_compare_and_swap . should I use " __sync_val_compare_and_swap" to implement `_