Re: [hpc-sig-devel] GCC extensions for `hcqc'

2017-08-28 Thread Masaki Arai
Hi, Thank you very much for your quick check and reply. Kugan Vivekanandarajah writes: > > I looked into the structure, adding this field is not going to make the s= > tructure bigger for either ILP32 or LP64 targets. If you want, you use bit= > -fields; there is one bool already there which me

Re: [hpc-sig-devel] GCC extensions for `hcqc'

2017-08-28 Thread Kugan Vivekanandarajah
Hi, On 29 August 2017 at 04:54, Masaki Arai wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you very much for your quick check and reply. > > Kugan Vivekanandarajah writes: >> > I looked into the structure, adding this field is not going to make the > s= >> tructure bigger for either ILP32 or LP64 targets. If you want,