Re: GNU GCC development plan and its interaction with Linaro

Thanks Yvan Roux & Charles Baylis for the help. On 2 December 2015 at 20:20, Charles Baylis wrote: > On 2 December 2015 at 14:15, Yvan Roux wrote: > > >> 1. What is the difference between experimental(gcc 6.0.0 stage 3) & gcc > >> release branch (gcc 5.2.1)? > > > > trunk (actual gcc 6.0.0) is

incomplete .arch specifiers with latest Linaro gcc5 patches on armv8?

Hi, when working with the Linaro patches I found that a particular commit breaks our aarch64 kernel build. The patch in question is that one: commit be09330da9d0777c4a58568d137e3f8a3dbe0a0b Author: Yvan Roux Date: Tue Oct 27 21:18:19 2015 +0100 One of the things it attempts to change apparen

[ACTIVITY] Nov 30- Dec 4, 2015

== Progress == * Validation - a few cleanup patches in the comparison scripts - contribute to debug of ptys allocation problems: the tests pass when executed outside of our schroots. - improvements in the reports from the validation done in the ST Compute Farm - reported a few regre

Re: incomplete .arch specifiers with latest Linaro gcc5 patches on armv8?

Hi Robert, On 4 December 2015 at 15:13, Robert Schiele wrote: > Hi, > > when working with the Linaro patches I found that a particular commit > breaks our aarch64 kernel build. > > The patch in question is that one: > > commit be09330da9d0777c4a58568d137e3f8a3dbe0a0b > Author: Yvan Roux > Date

[ACTIVITY] 30th Nov - 04th Dec

* One day off on Monday. # Progress # * Answer ST questions about supporting multi-arch with ST jtag probe. [1/10] * TCWG-171, Enable gdb core file tests when testing remotely, [3/10]. Ongoing. * Run gdb.base/sizeof.exp with board having gdb,noinferiorio. Done. [1/10] * TCWG-460, mutli-ar

Re: incomplete .arch specifiers with latest Linaro gcc5 patches on armv8?

On 4 December 2015 at 16:47, Yvan Roux wrote: > Hi Robert, > > > > On 4 December 2015 at 15:13, Robert Schiele wrote: >> Hi, >> >> when working with the Linaro patches I found that a particular commit >> breaks our aarch64 kernel build. >> >> The patch in question is that one: >> >> commit be0933

[ACTIVITY]

== Progress == * Ill (4/10) * Support (1/10) - Bugzilla issues (PR20490, PR24635, PR24350, PR20025, PR25720, PR25722) * Benchmarks (1/10) - Checking some previous benchmark results on A57 * Buildbots (2/10) - Getting AArch64 full bot back to rotation, since it's stable now - Re-enabling lib

Re: incomplete .arch specifiers with latest Linaro gcc5 patches on armv8?

Hi Yvan, On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Yvan Roux wrote: > On 4 December 2015 at 16:47, Yvan Roux wrote: >> Hmmm, this seems to be triggered by -mgeneral-regs-only flag, at least >> on my side, I've to investigate more to give you a real answer, this >> backport is not a small one ;) But do yo