[ACTIVITY] 13 - 17 October 2014

2014-10-20 Thread Omair Javaid
== Progress == Catch up with work after return from Eid ul Adha and Annual Holidays [7/10] * Hong Kong visa application * UPS repairs and office cleanup * Catching up with work, gdb roadmap and open/running cards. * Emails/Patch scrolling/Meetings etc * Sick day off on Monday GDB Tracep

[ACTIVITY] Week 42

2014-10-20 Thread Yvan Roux
== Issues == * Still no network at home and will not be fixed before at least one week :( == Progress == * GCC 4.9 2014.10 (8/10) - Merged FSF 4.9 branch - Released Linaro 4.9 2014.10 * Misc: (2/10) - Various meetings. == Plan == * Analyse some failures that occur only in --enable-release

[ACTIVITY] Week 42

2014-10-20 Thread Charles Baylis
== Progress == Sick leave [2/10] Patch submission for vldN_lane [1/10] Attempting to run SPEC2k6 on Juno [6/10] Misc [1/10] irc support, openjdk suspected compiler bug, meetings, mailing lists ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.

[ACTIVITY] 13 October 2014 to 17 October 2014.

2014-10-20 Thread Venkataramanan Kumar
= Progress == * Core mark benchmark and report for PGO and PGO + LTO (TCWG-544) (6/10) Going by CPU cycles adding LTO gains in x86 and degrades in Aarch64 . Looked at hot functions and examining assembly the code generation seems to be same. X86_64 does alignment of code. Also branch misses decrea

[Activity] Oct 13-19

2014-10-20 Thread Rob Savoye
== Progress == * Part way through integrating Cbuild2/Jenkins with Gerrit. (#1692, 8/10) - Implemented functions to use the REST API to Gerrit via SSH. - Integrated into build and test processes. * Meetings and Misc (2/10) - Ordered 10 Snapdragon boards == Plan == * F

[ACTIVITY] 13th - 17th October

2014-10-20 Thread Bernie Ogden
cbuild2 benchmarking - TCWG-360 [3/10] * A few small enhancements and bug-fixes * Tried to run spec2006 on Juno, looks tricky libm profiling - CARD-1693 [3/10] * Pulled together lapack + blas * Looked a bit at how it exercises libm on x86 * Tried to look at how it exercises libm on Juno, looks tri

答复: Will this ARM64 erratum patch be backported to this month's Linaro GCC 4.9 release?

2014-10-20 Thread Panshilin (Peter)
Hi Yvan : Thanks. other questions about this patch: Will the patch stay in all arm64 compilers for ever? or someday it will be discarded for optimization reasons? Would you provide a compiler option which enable or disable the patch during buiding and if so what the option is? Thanks again.