Hi Richard,
After adding some new ops, I can keep the conditional compare to the
end of tree-level optimization. As tests, I expand conditional compare
to BIT_AND_EXPR/BIT_IOR_EXPR, which still depend on later "combine"
pass to combine them.
Is it possible to expand it to *cmp_and/*cmp_ior like p
== Progress ==
* Performed investigation on gdb7.6 test suite failures and untested test
cases.
* Updated JIRA enteries with test suite failures on arm to track progress.
* Wrote an automation script for selection of individual test cases from a
text file.
* Got the gdb.dwarf2 test suite patch
Hello Paul,
I would suggest you to build a binary of your project with debug info and
no optimization using linaro toolchain from commandline. This will rule out
any overridden options by eclipse.
If you are using a jtag connection for debugging it could be problem with
your probe configuration a
All,
In the Toolchain Working Group Mans has been doing some examination of SPEC
2000 and SPEC 2006 to see what C Library (glibc) routines impact performance
the most, and are worth tuning.
This has come up with two areas we consider worthy of further investigation:
1) malloc performance
2)
On 28 May 2013 12:03, Matthew Gretton-Dann
wrote:
> So before we go any further I would like to see what the view of LEG is
> about a better malloc. My questions boil down to:
>
> * Is malloc important - or do server applications just implement their own?
The Apache web server manages its heap
