On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 05/02/2012 09:24 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
>>> Right. So then, the question is where we stand with GLIBC, Carlos?
>>
>> It's going through Mentor's build/test cycle right now with the n
Hi there. Let's bump the Monday meeting to Tuesday due to the UK bank holiday.
I'll update the invite,
-- Michael
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
I've lost track of the benchmark builds so I've started a manual todo list at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/Todo
It's been messy with the validation lab being down and some builds
being in my home office and some in Cambridge. Let me know if I'm
missing any.
-- Michael
_
On 5 May 2012 03:40, Ken Werner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OpenEmbedded-Core/meta-linaro:
> * created meta-linaro denzil branch to be used in conjunction with the oe
> release
Yocto 1.2 is out and this branch seem pretty quiet. Any idea when
they'll tag/release?
> * added a patch that prevents GCC from
Hi there. We'd like to run a Fast Model in the validation lab for KVM
testing. Is there a blueprint for this? What's the status?
Paul and I discussed a rough plan a few months ago. It was along the lines of:
* A x86 machine as the Fast Model host
* An emulated vexpress-a15 as the KVM host
*
Summary:
* arm-linux-gnueabihf and multilib support for linaro toolchain.
* Code size benchmark analysis.
Details:
1. arm-linux-gnueabihf support for linaro toolchain
* Update gcc, libgcc and libstdc++ config to support the triplet.
* Update build scripts to gnueabihf.
* Add sample config fo
