Re: Bombing U-Boot on ARMv4, any hints?

2012-03-06 Thread Michael Hope
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Michael Hope wrote: > >> Hi Linus.  Is this the arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc from the Ubuntu binary >> package? > > It's the binary package from: > https://launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries/trunk/2012.02/+downl

Bug triaging of 945503

2012-03-06 Thread Asa Sandahl
Hi! I need a little help with triaging of this bug, it is a little different from the ones I have triaged so far: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/945503 - gcc-4.7 branch imports fail (timeouts) It is already set to Confirmed, my question is what is needed to go to the triaged stage? A

Updates sysroots for binary toolchain

2012-03-06 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Hi Updated sysroots for binary toolchain are available at [1]. This time I split -dev and -dbg sysroots so as long as dbgsym are not needed less disk space is used. Please take a look at them and report any issues. 1. http://people.linaro.org/~hrw/generic-linux/sysroots/20120301/ __

Test failures due to directory names in the test farm

2012-03-06 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Hello, since this long-standing problem just hit me again, I had a quick look at test failures in our farm that appear to occur whenever the directory name contains a string that is being checked for via a "scan-assembler" test, e.g.: +FAIL: gcc.target/arm/sat-1.c scan-assembler-times ssat 4 +FA

Re: Test failures due to directory names in the test farm

2012-03-06 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 6 March 2012 16:55, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > Hello, > > since this long-standing problem just hit me again, I had a quick look at > test failures in our farm that appear to occur whenever the directory name > contains a string that is being checked for via a "scan-assembler" test, > e.g.: > >

Re: Test failures due to directory names in the test farm

2012-03-06 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > Is it possible that the version string has the name of the branch ? > That's the only thing I can think of that could be different and could > cause this problem. > > In this : > http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7 > +bzr114970~uweigand~usatssat-4.7/logs/x

Re: Bombing U-Boot on ARMv4, any hints?

2012-03-06 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Michael Hope wrote: > Hacking this into an assembly file then running objdump over it > suggests this is Thumb-2 code.  I think that's the problem. Probably so... > Sorry I don't have a solution.  We're considering multilib in the > future but it's not Linaro's

Re: Problem running updated compiz branches on ARM

2012-03-06 Thread Andrew Stubbs
Hi Alexandros, Could you use the linaro-toolchain list for stuff like this please? You're more likely to find somebody who knows the answer that way. I'm pretty sure the problem is not the compiler because, as far as I can see, both architectures' compilers emit ".weak" directives. If there i

Re: Test failures due to directory names in the test farm

2012-03-06 Thread Michael Hope
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > >> Is it possible that the version string has the name of the branch ? >> That's the only thing I can think of that could be different and could >> cause this problem. >> >> In this : >> http://ex.seabright.co.n

Re: Updates sysroots for binary toolchain

2012-03-06 Thread Michael Hope
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Hi > > Updated sysroots for binary toolchain are available at [1]. This time I > split -dev and -dbg sysroots so as long as dbgsym are not needed less > disk space is used. > > Please take a look at them and report any issues. > > 1. http

Re: Bug triaging of 945503

2012-03-06 Thread Michael Hope
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Asa Sandahl wrote: > Hi! > > I need a little help with triaging of this bug, it is a little different > from the ones I have triaged so far: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/945503 - gcc-4.7 branch imports > fail (timeouts) > > It is already set to Con

GDB for Android Card (was: Re: Cards)

2012-03-06 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
Hello, On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 10:12 +1300, Michael Hope wrote: > Hi Ken, Thiago. Could you try your hand at writing cards for the > OpenEmbedded Core meta-layer and GDB and Android? Here is my initial version: https://wiki.linaro.org/ThiagoBauermann/Sandbox/GDBforAndroid What do you think? -- [

Re: Problem running updated compiz branches on ARM

2012-03-06 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
(Hit send too soon on my last mail and appear to have removed linaro-toolchain Apologies to those who get duplicates) On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:00:36PM +, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > Hi Alexandros, > > Could you use the linaro-toolchain list for stuff like this please? > You're more likely to find

Re: Updates sysroots for binary toolchain

2012-03-06 Thread Zhenqiang Chen
On 7 March 2012 05:55, Michael Hope wrote: > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz > wrote: >> Hi >> >> Updated sysroots for binary toolchain are available at [1]. This time I >> split -dev and -dbg sysroots so as long as dbgsym are not needed less >> disk space is used. >> >> Please

Re: GDB for Android Card (was: Re: Cards)

2012-03-06 Thread Michael Hope
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 10:12 +1300, Michael Hope wrote: >> Hi Ken, Thiago. Could you try your hand at writing cards for the >> OpenEmbedded Core meta-layer and GDB and Android? > > Here is my initial version: > > https://wik