On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:59:53PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> "V, Aneesh" wrote:
>
> > I agree that not marking the assembly functions ' %function' is a problem
> > in the code, so it's not a critical bug. But I would've been happier if
> > the linker refused to link it rather than branching
On Tue 21 Feb 2012 09:57:12 GMT, Dave Martin wrote:
struct pad_conf_entry {
u16 offset;
u16 val;
} __attribute__ ((packed));
The "packed" attribute specifies that all struct elements ought to be
considered to have alignment requirement 1 instead of their default
alignment.
Andrew Stubbs wrote on 21.02.2012 11:56:07:
> I'm not sure, but I believe that the compiler requires (prefers) any
> structs that you want included inside packed structs to be themselves
> packed, so you can end up with some structs with apparently unnecessary
> attributes on them.
I don't see w
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:05:54PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Andrew Stubbs wrote on 21.02.2012 11:56:07:
>
> > I'm not sure, but I believe that the compiler requires (prefers) any
> > structs that you want included inside packed structs to be themselves
> > packed, so you can end up with som
I've changed the bounce host used to gain access to the boards at my
home office. The ports and configuration are the same but you will
get a scary error due to the SSH host key changing.
Let me know if there are any problems,
-- Michael
___
linaro-to
