On 26 September 2011 21:51, Michael Hope wrote:
> Saw this on the linaro-multimedia list:
> http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-multimedia/2011-September/74.html
>
> libpng spends a significant amount of time in memcpy(). This might
> tie in with Ramana's investigation or the unaligned
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:47:33AM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On 26 September 2011 21:51, Michael Hope wrote:
> > Saw this on the linaro-multimedia list:
> > http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-multimedia/2011-September/74.html
> >
> > libpng spends a significant amount of time
On 27 September 2011 14:16, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:47:33AM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>> On 26 September 2011 21:51, Michael Hope wrote:
>> > Saw this on the linaro-multimedia list:
>> > http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-multimedia/2011-Septemb
> If you guys could take a look at this there is a potential requirement
> for the MMWG around libpng optimization; we could fit this in along with
> other work (possible vectorizing, etc) on that component.
Getting better block operations out of the compiler is something we
are interested in and
Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:59:24PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > I guess I could give him a ping, but since he didn't revert my patch
after
> > all, it didn't seem a priority to me ...
>
> Interesting. You could reach out and reping just out of courtesy -- I
> d
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> And yes, we can end up processing the interrupt before the SVC is
> executed, which is still a hole. So we need to avoid doing the
> restart in userspace - which might actually make things easier.
> I'll take a look into that over the weekend.
Hi Russell, I was
