Hi there. The 2011.08 release has been spun and is testing up well.
The 4.5 and 4.6 branches are now open so feel free to commit any
approved patches.
-- Michael
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.or
Hi,
is the Linaro toolchain (esp. gcc) useful on x86/x86_64, or is an
attempt to use the Linaro toolchain with such a target just asking for
trouble?
(No, I'm not secretly an Intel spy ;) Just trying to have some fun
with my desktop machine ;) )
ttyl
bero
_
On 17 August 2011 12:09, Bernhard Rosenkranzer
wrote:
> Hi,
> is the Linaro toolchain (esp. gcc) useful on x86/x86_64, or is an
> attempt to use the Linaro toolchain with such a target just asking for
> trouble?
> (No, I'm not secretly an Intel spy ;) Just trying to have some fun
> with my desktop
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 04:09:21AM -0700, Bernhard Rosenkranzer wrote:
> is the Linaro toolchain (esp. gcc) useful on x86/x86_64, or is an
> attempt to use the Linaro toolchain with such a target just asking for
> trouble?
Isn't this exactly what Ubuntu do for all their releases (from when we
star
We use the Linaro x86 toolchain to cross-compile full system images
for our embedded target, which work great. I apply a subset of the
Ubuntu patchset to Linaro gcc and gdb as well as upstream eglibc and
binutils. (I omit the multilib patches and some other things that
didn't seem necessary for t
FYI
On 17 August 2011 02:09, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. The 2011.08 release has been spun and is testing up well.
> The 4.5 and 4.6 branches are now open so feel free to commit any
> approved patches.
>
> -- Michael
>
> ___
> linaro-toolchain mail
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Bernhard Rosenkranzer
wrote:
> Hi,
> is the Linaro toolchain (esp. gcc) useful on x86/x86_64, or is an
> attempt to use the Linaro toolchain with such a target just asking for
> trouble?
> (No, I'm not secretly an Intel spy ;) Just trying to have some fun
> with m
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Michael Hope writes:
>> I put a build harness around libav and gathered some profiling data. See:
>> bzr branch lp:~linaro-toolchain-dev/+junk/libav-suite
>>
>> It includes a Makefile that builds a C only, h.264 only decoder and
>> tw
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Michael Hope writes:
>>> I put a build harness around libav and gathered some profiling data. See:
>>> bzr branch lp:~linaro-toolchain-dev/+junk/libav-suite
>>>
>>> It includ
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Richard Earnshaw
wrote:
> I was just browsing libgmp this afternoon and noticed that it really
> could do with an overhaul to support recent ARM chips.
>
> The ARM code seems to have been written for StrongARM; which is now
> almost obsolete (for example, it loads
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2011.08
release of both Linaro GCC 4.6 and Linaro GCC 4.5.
Linaro GCC 4.6 2011.08 is the sixth release in the 4.6 series. Based
off the latest GCC 4.6.1+svn177703, it focuses on fixing bugs found
during the Android integration and in S
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release
of Linaro QEMU 2011.08.
Linaro QEMU 2011.08 is the latest monthly release of qemu-linaro. Based
off upstream (trunk) QEMU, it includes a number of ARM-focused bug fixes
and enhancements.
This month's release is primarily minor
On 18 August 2011 02:43, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Michael Hope
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Michael Hope writes:
I put a build harness around libav and gathered some profiling data. See:
bzr branch lp:~
13 matches
Mail list logo
