On 11 August 2011 05:25, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. This is a heads-up that the name of the Toolchain group
> releases will change slightly with next weeks release. We're dropping
> the respin suffix (the -0) to line up with the new whole of Linaro
> naming convention.
So I still don't rea
Hi,
* fixed PR 50014 and 50039 - to be backported to linaro-gcc
* tested the patch to change the default vector size on NEON
* found one test that fails with quad-words -
gcc.c-torture/execute/mode-dependent-address.c. Debugging it with
Ramana.
* started looking into widening shifts
Vacation plan
Hi all,
On ARM, we've now hit the problem a few times of temporarily
overriding the assembler state (or rather, not being able to do this
reliably). For example, sometimes there's a need to assemble a few
instructions for a different architecture version so we can optionally
execute or skip them
Dave Martin writes:
> However, there's not really anything fundamentally
> architecture-specific about this problem, and ideally the solution and
> the directives should not be architecture-specific either.
> One option which appeals to me is to have some directives which can
> exist across all ar
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Dave Martin writes:
>> However, there's not really anything fundamentally
>> architecture-specific about this problem, and ideally the solution and
>> the directives should not be architecture-specific either.
>> One option which ap
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:32:51PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 03:08:53PM -0700, Taras Glek wrote:
> > >You should definitely be trying to build using the Linaro 4.5 and 4.6
> > >compiler branches; they are pretty much guaranteed to give you better
> > >performan
Hi there. I've written up the standard configurations that we use to
build and test Linaro GCC:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Configurations/GCC
It includes such things as flags, libraries, and sysroots. You might
find it useful to see what we're testing or, if new to compiler
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 05:25, Michael Hope wrote:
>> Hi there. This is a heads-up that the name of the Toolchain group
>> releases will change slightly with next weeks release. We're dropping
>> the respin suffix (the -0) to line up with the ne
