I've just submitted a merge request for the vldN and vstN intrinsic
improvements. There are five related patches, so I thought it might
be easier to review the merge if I posted the individual changes here.
See:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org/msg00969.html
for
This first patch optimises the output for vld3q and vld4q functions.
These functions expand into two individual vld3 and vld4 instructions,
with each instruction setting one (interleaved) half of the output
register. The problem was that both instructions treated the
output register as an input, w
The patterns for the Neon vld and vst intrinsics used the following sort
of construct to refer to memory:
(mem:FOO (match_operand:SI X "register_operand" "r"))
This patch changes them to use:
(match_operand:FOO' X "neon_struct_operand" "(=)Um")
instead. This allows the loads to use pos
This patch allows the target to override MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE for
specific kinds of array. We can then give a non-BLK mode to things
like uint32x2x4_t, which in turn allows them to be stored in registers.
The patch is a backport of:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg02192.html
whi
This patch converts LEGITIMATE_CONSTANT_P into a target hook and
passes along the mode of the constant. This can then be used by 5/5.
The patch is a version of:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00195.html
which is still pending review after two pings. It seems pretty simple
tho
This patch handles moves involving structure constants. It's a backport of:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00200.html
which Richard Earnshaw has approved, but which cannot be applied yet
because it depends on 4/5. The patch is needed because 3/5 would
otherwise expose new inst
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 01:33:12PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 04:23:09PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > > Hopefully this explains what's going on, but what are you trying
> > > to achieve exactly?
> > >
> > Thanks a ton, Dave.
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 01:33:12PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > You must not use static variable in the decompressor. For one thing,
> > that breaks the ability to XIP the decompressor code and move writable
> > data elsewhere.
> >
> > So the fix is
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 01:33:12PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> > You must not use static variable in the decompressor. For one thing,
>> > that breaks the ability to XIP the decompressor c
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 01:33:12PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> > You must not use static variable in the decompressor. For one thi
Here's a script for installing TI's DVSDK 3:
https://bitbucket.org/thayne/ti-omap-tools/src
Works with
- CodeSourcery
- OpenEmbedded
- Linaro
It will download the bazillion dependencies scattered across TI's site and
makes it easier to gut the DVSDK's hard-coded paths to work for your
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release
of both Linaro GCC 4.5 and Linaro GCC 4.6.
Linaro GCC 4.5 2011.04 is the ninth release in the 4.5 series. Based
off the latest
GCC 4.5.2+svn171921, it adds new optimisations, support for Android,
and fixes for many of the issue
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the release
of Linaro GDB 7.2.
Linaro GDB 7.2 2011.04 is the fifth release in the 7.2 series. Based
off the latest GDB 7.2, it includes a number of ARM-focused bug fixes.
This release fixes:
* LP: #684218 Failure to backtrace out of glibc
13 matches
Mail list logo
