Merged fixes for several bug into Linaro GCC 4.5. Both from Linaro
(Richard, Matthias and Ramana), and from CS (the shrink wrap problems).
Continued working on benchmarking the patches I've merged to 4.6. Spent
quite some time trying to figure out why EEMBC and the Spec2K weren't
working prope
On 13/03/11 22:28, Michael Hope wrote:
I specifically want to include gcc-linaro-tracking items. That's why I added
them.
Hi Andrew. What is your goal here? I'm concerned as
status.linaro.org counts each tracking ticket as a work item and this
inflates the amount of work recorded. I've assum
Hi,
2009/11/2 Mark Hymers :
> On Mon, 02, Nov, 2009 at 12:43:42PM +, Philipp Kern spoke thus..
>> Of course it is a sane approach but very special care needs to be taken when
>> releasing to ensure GPL compliance. So what we should get is support in the
>> toolchain to declare against what so
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 02:04:30PM +, Hector Oron wrote:
> the package is not optimal, but once we got multiarch support, it should
> be renamed to `binutils-armel' (or similar name) and use linux and eglibc
> libraries and headers provided by multiarch.
Please note that building such a packag
