On 01/03/11 07:00, Jim Huang wrote:
I think thats fine. however, how do we ensure that we have patches
> that always apply to both release/snapshots? do we maintain branches
> for gcc-patches.git in case you need two versions of patch X if the
> linaro gcc codebase diverged?
I might need help
On 1 March 2011 18:07, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 01/03/11 07:00, Jim Huang wrote:
>>> I think thats fine. however, how do we ensure that we have patches
>>> > that always apply to both release/snapshots? do we maintain branches
>>> > for gcc-patches.git in case you need two versions of patch X i
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> The resulting kernel builds and boots but some modules have problems:
>>
>> $ modprobe fat
>> fat: unknown relocation: 102
>> FATAL: Error inserting vfat
>
> A workaround for what appears to be
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>>
>>> The resulting kernel builds and boots but some modules have problems:
>>>
>>> $ modprobe fat
>>> fat: unknown relocation: 102
>>>
