On 8 February 2011 17:34, Julian Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:22:32 +
> Julian Brown wrote:
>
>> IIRC I couldn't figure out the magic incantation needed to do it last
>> time I tried. I don't think the "--with-endian=xxx" option is
>> supported for ARM. Possibly the way to do it is to
Hi Richard,
As you might know, Richard Earnshaw, maintainer of "ELF for the ARM
Architecture" is currently on sabbatical and does not return until the end of
February. I note that nobody else on arm.eabi has picked up the baton ... :-)
so ...
I don't fully understand your request. You need to
Hi Lee,
Thanks for the reply.
Lee Smith writes:
> To the extent that I do understand your request I think you are asking
> for one new _dynamic relocation_ code to be allocated. (A dynamic
> relocation is one that is usually performed by a dynamic linker
> (because, for example, the referred-to
*** To avoid confusion, please delete the version of this E-mail sent Wed
09/02/2011 11:45
*** I was confused about BLX - a cycle ride fixed that!
*** 16 is a poor choice of relocation number for GCC (Richard Sandiford tells
me) so use 140.
Hi Richard,
As you might know, Richard Earnshaw, maint
I mentioned in the toolchain standup call that I'd done a quick
estimate of the work required to support vexpress, so I thought I
might as well clean it up a little and post it.
This is a quick summary and time estimate for adding Versatile
Express support to qemu. The general idea is that most of
Hello Will,
I've been trying to get GDB support for hardware watchpoints/breakpoints
going. I've ported Matthew's GDB patch to current mainline, and am running
this under a 2.6.37-1002-linaro-omap kernel on an IGEPv2 board.
However, something seems to be not quite working: I'm seeing this kern
> Hello Will,
Hi Ulrich,
> I've been trying to get GDB support for hardware watchpoints/breakpoints
> going. I've ported Matthew's GDB patch to current mainline, and am running
> this under a 2.6.37-1002-linaro-omap kernel on an IGEPv2 board.
Great - it's nice to see somebody using this stuff!
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 20:25:32 Will Deacon wrote:
> > - Why is architecture 0x4 not supported? This seems to be the variant of
> > the v7 debug architecture with memory-mapped registers. Apparently the
> > IGEP only supports this version ... Do you know what the
> > Beagle-/Pandaboard an
