Hi,
We would like to build Android with the Linaro tool chain. Do any of you
know what kind of work will be needed to adapt Linaro gcc to Android?
Regards,
Patrik
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.or
Hello,
Matthias noticed the following ICE when attempting to build the SPU
compiler from the Linaro GCC 4.5 sources:
../../../../src-spu/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__fixunssfdi':
../../../../src-spu/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1344:1: internal compiler
error: in
spu_expand_mov, at config/
On 12/20/2010 8:35 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Matthias noticed the following ICE when attempting to build the SPU
> compiler from the Linaro GCC 4.5 sources:
With our Linaro hats on, is this something about which we should be
concerned -- other than in so far as we want to get the patch accepted
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> On 12/20/2010 8:35 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Matthias noticed the following ICE when attempting to build the SPU
> > compiler from the Linaro GCC 4.5 sources:
>
> With our Linaro hats on, is this something about which we should be
> concerned -- other than in so far as w
On 12/20/2010 9:01 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Well, I understand we -as Linaro- would like to see Ubuntu base their
> compiler on ours, but Ubuntu prefers to use a single source base for the
> compiler for all their supported platforms, including SPU. If we break
> some of those other platforms
== Last Week ==
* Continued working on ARM unwinding in libunwind. Produced a draft
write-up of my progress in the event that I don't finish this work
before being swapped out of Linaro.
* (Re-)submitted patches to fix ltrace test suite. Hopefully, these will
be the last changes before the new re
On 20.12.2010 18:35, Mark Mitchell wrote:
On 12/20/2010 9:01 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Well, I understand we -as Linaro- would like to see Ubuntu base their
compiler on ours, but Ubuntu prefers to use a single source base for the
compiler for all their supported platforms, including SPU. If we
On 12/20/2010 10:54 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> So, I'll build without Linaro on powerpc. Next we'll see regressions on
> ix86 and x86_64, which are not fixed, so stop building these
> architectures without the Linaro changes? Or build without Linaro on
> ix86 and x86_64? Or maybe be a bit more
