On 30 November 2010 14:51, Julian Brown wrote:
>> >>> I think we need to somehow enhance MEM_REF, or maybe generate a
>> >>> MEM_REF for the first vector and a builtin after it.
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, keeping these things looking like memory references to most
>> >> of the compiler seems like a good p
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:16:16 +0200
Ira Rosen wrote:
> >> > v0 = MEM_REF (addr)
> >> > v1 = MEM_REF (addr + 8B)
> >> > v2 = MEM_REF (addr + 16B)
> >> > builtin (v0, v1, v2, stride=3, reg_stride=1,...)
> >
> > Would the builtin be changing the semantics of the preceding MEM_REF
> > codes? If so I do
