On 17/08/10 23:38, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi Andrew. I'm confused - apart from a few differences, our methods
> seem to be the same.
>
> The differences against Method 1 are:
> 1. Every revision has an associated ticket
> 2. There's a bot that automatically creates a ticket per revision
Yes, b
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 17/08/10 23:38, Michael Hope wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew. I'm confused - apart from a few differences, our methods
>> seem to be the same.
>>
>> The differences against Method 1 are:
>> 1. Every revision has an associated ticket
>> 2. There'
Sorry about these. Hopefully I'm done.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Michael Hope <620...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Related: lp:gcc-linaro/4.5,revno=99360
>
> Code hoisting improvements
>
> Merged from SourceryG++
>
> (Backport from FSF)
>
> ** Affects: gcc-linaro
>
I've had a go at adding the basic trackerbot functionality to:
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/patchtrack
This page lists all revisions on a branch. Any revisions that don't
have a corresponding ticket are marked in orange and have a 'Create
one' link. Clicking this link takes you to a pre-f
