> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
>
> ________
> From: linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org
> on behalf of Matthew Gretton-Dann
>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 4:27 AM
> To: linaro-toolchain
> Subject: New IRC Channel for Linaro Toolc
Hi all,
Since freenode has gone down hill, are there any plans for moving the IRC
channels to another server, like OFTC?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
From: linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org
on behalf of Matthew Gretton-Dann
Sent: Tuesday, March 12
ync_fetch_and_add ?
>
I don't know, I suggest you contact Linaro support (LDTS).
Thanks,
Christophe
>
> Best regard.
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Christophe Lyon [mailto:christophe.l...@linaro.org]
> 发送时间: 2018年1月15日 17:28
> 收件人: zhangwentao (M)
> 抄送: linaro-t
re_and_swap" to implement `__sync_fetch_and_add_4` Or
__sync_fetch_and_add ?
Best regard.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Christophe Lyon [mailto:christophe.l...@linaro.org]
发送时间: 2018年1月15日 17:28
收件人: zhangwentao (M)
抄送: linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org; Lizefan; leijitang; Huangqiang (H)
主题: Re:
;
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Christophe Lyon [mailto:christophe.l...@linaro.org]
> 发送时间: 2018年1月10日 18:38
> 收件人: zhangwentao (M)
> 抄送: linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org; Lizefan; leijitang; Huangqiang (H)
> 主题: Re: [update]: Does linaro toolchain support c++11 ??
>
> On 1
yon [mailto:christophe.l...@linaro.org]
发送时间: 2018年1月10日 18:38
收件人: zhangwentao (M)
抄送: linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org; Lizefan; leijitang; Huangqiang (H)
主题: Re: [update]: Does linaro toolchain support c++11 ??
On 10 January 2018 at 03:40, zhangwentao (M) wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I ha
tance should avoid the problem because the compiler will be able to
generate synchronization primitives inline.
Christophe
> 发件人: zhangwentao (M)
> 发送时间: 2018年1月10日 10:22
> 收件人: 'linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org'
> 抄送: Huangqiang (H); Lizefan; leijitang
> 主题: Does linaro to
on
};
^
wentao@ubuntu:~/test/lamda$
___________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
rror: cannot convert 'main()::' to 'Func {aka void
(*)()}' in initialization
};
^
wentao@ubuntu:~/test/lamda$
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
Hi,
I am using the following linaro toolchain and need to create a license
manifest in terms what are the packages are there, what license they use.
https://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/
5.2-2015.11-2/aarch64-linux-gnu/
I don't see any such manifest in the release ar
Arndt
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
s with a registry change. I don't know what this will do to
windows programs that might not be expecting case sensitive
filenames..
Jim
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
Actually NTFS can be made to be case sensitive.
-Original Message-
From: linaro-toolchain [mailto:linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Wilson
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 5:26 PM
To: Gunnar Arndt
Cc: Linaro Toolchain Mailman List
Subject: Re: Linaro toolchain
ssue if
you want to use the netfilter package, which is not common in
application programs. If you do need to use netfilter, then you may
need to use a linux hosted cross compiler instead of a windows hosted
cross compiler.
Jim
_______
linaro-toolchain ma
this is the case, then you might need to
use a linux tar to properly extract it, which means for instance the
cygwin tar, with winsymlinks set.
Jim
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailma
in theory work.
Jim
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
n't try this, but this should
in theory work.
Jim
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
m to extract the package. I don't know if
there is a non-cygwin tar available, but you could extract on a linux
machine, use zip to create a zip/pkzip archive, and then use a windows
unzip/pkzip program to extract it. I didn't try this, but this should
in theory work.
Jim
__
Windows 7
with the Linaro toolchain, it fails with the following message:
C:\firedect\dev\workspace\Test-Linux-ARM_1> "\Program Files (x86)\GNU
Tools ARM Embedded\gcc-linaro-4.9-2016.02-i686-ming
w32_arm-linux-gnueabi\bin\arm-linux-gnueabi-g++.exe" main.cpp
c:/program files (x86)/gnu t
linux.
> After plug it into Yocto as an external toolchain, it failed to install it
> correctly.
Yocto is linux, so there is a contradiction here. It isn't clear why
you are trying to do this, as this is not expected to work.
> ../meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devt
-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/external-linaro-toolchain/
external-linaro-toolchain.bb, do_install
| DEBUG: Executing shell function do_install
| cp: cannot stat
`/opt/gcc-linaro-arm-none-eabi-4.8-2014.04_linux/arm-none-eabi/libc/lib/*':
No such file or directory
Any suggestion?
Thanks,
On 20 October 2015 at 11:57, Luo Zhenhua wrote:
> Hi Jim and Fathi,
>
> Thanks a lot for the comments.
>
> Is it possible that gcc-5.x recipes go into jethro branch of
> meta-linaro-toolchain, or it will be integrated into master branch of
> meta-linaro-toolchain to supp
Hi Jim and Fathi,
Thanks a lot for the comments.
Is it possible that gcc-5.x recipes go into jethro branch of
meta-linaro-toolchain, or it will be integrated into master branch of
meta-linaro-toolchain to support Yocto 2.1 release?
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -Original Mess
release? when will the linaro gcc be upgraded to gcc-5.x?
We don't have ETA as TCWG hasn't released GCC 5.x based Linaro toolchain.
Once the source release will be done, it will be integrated into
meta-linaro-toolchain.
> I don't think that we have any say over Yocto. We just m
TW, can someone please help point out where the Linaro toolchain roadmap
> can be got?
There was a roadmap talk at the HKG15 Connect
http://connect.linaro.org/resource/hkg15/hkg15-203-tcwg-2015-roadmap-review/
I don't know if there is a more recent one.
Jim
____
Hi,
The default gcc version of Yocto 2.0(Jethro) is 5.2.0, the gcc version in
meta-linaro is gcc-4.9.4, may I know if gcc-linaro-4.9.4 will be used for Yocto
2.0 release? when will the linaro gcc be upgraded to gcc-5.x?
BTW, can someone please help point out where the Linaro toolchain roadmap
ng for specific sub-projects (ex. lld) is still
lacking. There are those that prefer that way, so that we have a
consistent formatting across all sub projects, but that's not
realistic for GNU sub-projects.
cheers,
--renato
_______
linaro-toolchain m
On 06/03/2015 11:07 AM, Kugan wrote:
On 03/06/15 16:39, Virendra Kumar Pathak wrote:
Hi Linaro Toolchain Group,
Is there any tool for checking coding style of the patches submitted to
the Linaro Toolchain ?
In other word is there any equivalent of Linux checkpatch.pl
<http://checkpatch
> On Jun 3, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Virendra Kumar Pathak
> wrote:
>
> Hi Linaro Toolchain Group,
>
> Is there any tool for checking coding style of the patches submitted to the
> Linaro Toolchain ?
> In other word is there any equivalent of Linux checkpatch.pl in
On 03/06/15 16:39, Virendra Kumar Pathak wrote:
> Hi Linaro Toolchain Group,
>
> Is there any tool for checking coding style of the patches submitted to
> the Linaro Toolchain ?
> In other word is there any equivalent of Linux checkpatch.pl
> <http://checkpatch.pl>
Hi Linaro Toolchain Group,
Is there any tool for checking coding style of the patches submitted to the
Linaro Toolchain ?
In other word is there any equivalent of Linux checkpatch.pl in Linaro
Toolchain (GCC, Binutils etc) ?
If yes, please let me know.
If not, then in general how people check
, I just found out our 2015.04 release can't
compile all of Open Embedded, whereas a older release worked fine.
- rob -
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
If
it is the new binutils that is the problem, then you can try using
objdump and/or readelf to look for subtle differences in the output
that might be causing problems.
Jim
___________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://li
Hi all,
I have built our customized u-boot (u-boot-2012.10-rc3), with two Linaro
toolchain, but have no luck with the latest toolchain.
The u-boot built with gcc-linaro-arm-none-eabi-4.9-2014.09_linux can boot on
the development board. This toolchain was pre-built toolchain from Linaro,
built
>
Both. There will be a tarball archive for the sources as well as the
binaries.
--
Ryan S. Arnold
Linaro Toolchain Working Group - Engineering Manager
www.linaro.org
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
y tarball? My guess would be that, if
binary toolchain users are going to look at a prerelease at all,
they'll only do so if it's already built for them.
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
ntly does not provide a monthly binary archive for the monthly
source archive. The binary archives are available on a quarterly cadence
only. We will continue the same policy when the monthly source archives
move to snapshots.linaro.org.
--
Ryan S. Arnold
Linaro Toolchain Working Group - Engine
Ryan,
On 17/04/2015 22:58, Ryan Arnold wrote:
Hello,
In an effort to provide a longer quality control window for quarterly
releases the Linaro Toolchain Working Group will be making some changes
to the release process starting with the forthcoming 2015.04 products.
Little will change for the
Hello,
In an effort to provide a longer quality control window for quarterly
releases the Linaro Toolchain Working Group will be making some changes to
the release process starting with the forthcoming 2015.04 products.
Little will change for the consumers of TCWG products.
The current monthly
dizzy-12.0.1/meta-yocto \
/home/praveenk/work/poky-dizzy-12.0.1/meta-yocto-bsp \
/home/praveenk/work/poky-dizzy-12.0.1/meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain \
"
BBLAYERS_NON_REMOVABLE ?= " \
/home/praveenk/work/poky-dizzy-12.0.1/meta \
/home/praveenk/work/poky-dizzy-12.0.1/meta-yocto \
I added
ot;.
I was trying to save characters, as the names were getting kinda long.
:-) After discussion, I'll go back to using the full triplet name. You
won't see this change till the next quarterly release though. (in Feb)
- rob -
________
member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
2013-07-30 10:01 GMT+08:00 Zhenqiang Chen :
> The Linaro Toolchain and Platform Working Groups are pleased to
> announce the 2013.07 release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a
> pre-built version of Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic
> Linux or Windows and targets the
Thanks for the reply, Will Newton.
Then can we expect the fix to be included for the official Android
toolchain 2014.11?
And, thanks for explaining the culprit of this bug, Jongsung Kim! :)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:00 PM,
wrote:
> Send linaro-toolchain mailing list submissions
--print-multi-lib
.;
It looks like the only choice is to build our own toolchain.
Any instruction to build multilib for armv4t?
Thanks!
Joel
From: Victor Chong [mailto:victor.ch...@linaro.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 2:12 PM
To: Joel (Xi Zhou) Zhou
Cc: linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
tor Chong [mailto:victor.ch...@linaro.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 31, 2014 1:04 PM
> *To:* Joel (Xi Zhou) Zhou
> *Cc:* linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
> *Subject:* Re: Linaro toolchain binary allowing soft-float?
>
>
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> Please ref
nk you for quick response!
Joel
From: Victor Chong [mailto:victor.ch...@linaro.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 1:04 PM
To: Joel (Xi Zhou) Zhou
Cc: linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: Linaro toolchain binary allowing soft-float?
Hi Joel,
Please refer to:
https://wiki.lina
(Xi Zhou) Zhou
wrote:
> Hi Linaro-toolchain team,
>
>
>
> I notice that the Linaro toolchain binary only support hard-float. We have
> a platform which is ARMv7 based does not support VFP.
>
> Could you generate toolchain binary for ARmv7 that allows soft-float?
>
Hi Linaro-toolchain team,
I notice that the Linaro toolchain binary only support hard-float. We have a
platform which is ARMv7 based does not support VFP.
Could you generate toolchain binary for ARmv7 that allows soft-float?
Thanks,
Joel
___
linaro
toolchain for 32
bits hosts. You only need untar the downloaded file and put it in your
favorite location.
If you want build the linaro toolchain you need download the source code
from
http://releases.linaro.org/14.05/components/toolchain/binaries/gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.9
Hello, as I mentioned in previous emails I cannot build the Linaro toolchain. I type the following commands:
wget http://releases.linaro.org/14.05/components/toolchain/binaries/gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.9-2014.05_linux.tar.xz
tar -xf gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.9
Hi,
Thanks Charles for the reply.
The .type directive works fine now.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Vishwa
-Original Message-
From: Charles Baylis [mailto:charles.bay...@linaro.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 12:32 AM
To: Vishwanath C
Cc: linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org; Yugandhar
L library, which I don't
have) your example runs successfully on QEMU.
Hope this helps
Charles
test_arndale.s
Description: Binary data
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
_TEST
void sTestArnDale();
#endif
int main()
{
printf("\nHello World\n");
#ifdef ARM_ASM_TEST
sTestArnDale();
#endif
return 0;
}
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://list
t both together. If you are using
"%ld" instead, this works in situations where "long" is the same size as "long
long" but may not work when these are different sizes.
--mev, Mike Vermeulen
___________
linaro-too
From: linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org
on behalf of Isidor Zeuner
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 2:05 PM
To: linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
Subject: detecting the linaro toolchain via C/C++ preprocessor
Hi there!
On Linaro gcc 4.6, I am facing an issue due to "long
est regards,
Isidor
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
opriate value, set arm mode and function type
of sTestArnDale symbol)
--
Will Newton
Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
test_arndale.s
Description: Binary data
___________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
estArnDale();
#endif
return 0;
}
Makefile.linux_test
Description: Binary data
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
e to `dlerror'
see 5916ffe0a19422706d1f84870adc603bad202f1c in meta-openembedded
you will need something like that. Don't think its toolchain related
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
ext) which uses latest tip of meta-openembedded
so I would suggest to cherry pick above said commit into you branch of
meta-openembedded which is under test.
___________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
e BINUTILS_VERSIONS appropriately. like
I did
in angstrom-next
> I'm doing a build right now with 1) and will try a build with 1) and 2) after
> that.
>
> --
> Koen Kooi
> Builds and Baselines | Release Manager
> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
signatu
2) is still building.
2) succeeded as well.
--
Koen Kooi
Builds and Baselines | Release Manager
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
selines | Release Manager
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
rce software for ARM SoCs
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
oftware for ARM SoCs
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
evtools/gcc/libgcc_4.7.bb |3 -
.../recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_linaro-4.7.bb |2 -
94 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8632 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross-canadian.inc
delete mode 100644
meta-linaro-toolch
vtools/gcc/libgcc_4.7.bb |3 -
.../recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_linaro-4.7.bb |2 -
94 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8632 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross-canadian.inc
delete mode 100644
meta-linaro-to
../recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_linaro-4.7.bb |2 -
94 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8632 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross-canadian.inc
delete mode 100644
meta-linaro-toolchain/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross-canad
Just before having to rename it to 2014, the Linaro Toolchain and Builds
and Baselines Working Groups are pleased to announce the 2013.12 release of
the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version of Linaro GCC and Linaro
GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and targets the glibc Linaro
The Linaro Toolchain and Builds and Baselines Working Groups are pleased to
announce the 2013.10 release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built
version of Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows
and targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross
The Linaro Toolchain and Platform Working Groups are pleased to announce
the 2013.09 release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version
of Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
This release introduces a set of
The Linaro Toolchain and Platform Working Groups are pleased to
announce the 2013.07 release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a
pre-built version of Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic
Linux or Windows and targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling ARM
On 21 June 2013 02:34, Bernhard Rosenkränzer
wrote:
> The Linaro Toolchain and Platform Working Groups are pleased to announce the
> 2013.06 release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version of
> Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and targets
&g
The Linaro Toolchain and Platform Working Groups are pleased to announce
the 2013.06 release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version
of Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling ARM
The Linaro Toolchain and Platform Working Groups are pleased to announce
the 2013.05 release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version
of Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling ARM
On 29 May 2013 18:24, BHARATH H S wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a usecase where linaro toolchain is used to build my executables and
> the sysroot is copied and used as glibc for running my embedded system.
> Reason for this is, I want to use the same glibc what the application is
> c
Hi,
I have a usecase where linaro toolchain is used to build my executables and
the sysroot is copied and used as glibc for running my embedded system.
Reason for this is, I want to use the same glibc what the application is
compiled against.
I found a bug fix from glibc community which I want to
The Linaro Toolchain and Platform Working Groups are pleased to announce
the 2013.04 release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version
of Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
This will likely be the last binary
Could you post the full command-line leading to this error?
Did you try to add -fPIC as suggested?
Christophe.
On 18 April 2013 09:53, Marius Cetateanu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago I had some problems linking my project libraries for
> Android using the Linaro toolchain 4
Hi,
Some time ago I had some problems linking my project libraries for
Android using the Linaro toolchain 4.7.1 which I reported to the
list:
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-toolchain/2012-June/002631.html
I ended up using the 4.6.x version of the compiler because
I could not find a
From: Denys Dmytriyenko
Otherwise eglibc version is set to UNKNOWN.
Similar fix is already in master.
Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko
---
conf/distro/include/external-linaro-toolchain-versions.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/distro/include
The Linaro Toolchain and Platform Working Groups are pleased to announce
the 2013.03 release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version
of Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling ARM
de for the Toolchain
Working Group.
This channel is public and open to anyone who wants to talk with the TCWG
group about anything toolchain related.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matthew Gretton-Dann
Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
_______
linaro-toolchain mailing l
The Linaro Toolchain and Platform Working Groups are pleased to announce
the 2013.02 release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version
of Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling ARM
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group and Platform Team are pleased to
announce the 2013.01
release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version of
Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling
On 4 January 2013 12:34, ljc wrote:
> Hi all!
> I use the arm-linux-gnueabihf-ct-ng.config in
> gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.7-2012.12-20121214_win32.zip to rebuild
> linaro-toolchain,but failured with the fellow messages:
>
> [INFO ] Performing some trivial sanity check
Hi all!
I use the arm-linux-gnueabihf-ct-ng.config in
gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.7-2012.12-20121214_win32.zip to rebuild
linaro-toolchain,but failured with the fellow messages:
[INFO ] Performing some trivial sanity checks
[INFO ] Build started 20130104.110952
[INFO ] Building
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2012.12
release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version of
Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling ARM applications
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2012.11
release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version of
Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling ARM applications
On 9 November 2012 22:22, zhangzhangwei wrote:
> hi,
> I use beaglebone ,and the CPU is AM3359 from TI
> can I use the linaro toolchain to the u-Boot linux kernel and android
> files?if I can ,which tool chain you suggest you use.
> other question, your android realese file also
hi,
I use beaglebone ,and the CPU is AM3359 from TI
can I use the linaro toolchain to the u-Boot linux kernel and android files?if
I can ,which tool chain you suggest you use.
other question, your android realese file also can use my CPU(AM3359),Can I
build image and download to my SD and run it
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2012.10
release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version of
Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling ARM applications
>>
>> >> On 26 September 2012 15:44, Shivamurthy Shastri
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I am using Linaro Toolchain for compiling UEFI and I am getting
>> >> > alignment
>> >> > faul
olve the problem.
>
> Hi Shiva. The instruction in your dump looks suspicious:
> LDRH r6, [sp, #0x37]
>
> sp should be eight byte aligned, so this ends up doing a half word
> load from an odd address. Could you upload the build log and a
> pre-built version of Fat.dll some
On 27 September 2012 01:06, Shivamurthy Shastri
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Fathi Boudra
> wrote:
>>
>> On 26 September 2012 15:44, Shivamurthy Shastri
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am using Linaro Toolchain for compiling
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 26 September 2012 15:44, Shivamurthy Shastri
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using Linaro Toolchain for compiling UEFI and I am getting alignment
> > fault as exception while running UEFI on Origen Board.
&g
On 26 September 2012 15:44, Shivamurthy Shastri
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Linaro Toolchain for compiling UEFI and I am getting alignment
> fault as exception while running UEFI on Origen Board.
> When I was using other cross compilers the issue was not there.
> The crash re
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2012.09
release of the Linaro Toolchain Binaries, a pre-built version of
Linaro GCC and Linaro GDB that runs on generic Linux or Windows and
targets the glibc Linaro Evaluation Build.
Uses include:
* Cross compiling ARM applications
On 3 September 2012 23:05, Matthew Gretton-Dann
wrote:
> Assaf,
>
> Just to let you know that linaro-toolchain-...@lists.launchpad.net is
> a closed list, a better place for this question is
> linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org.
>
> On 3 September 2012 11:41, Assaf
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
