Ramana Radhakrishnan writes:
> On 29 November 2011 12:04, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Ramana Radhakrishnan writes:
>>> Now that upstream trunk is in stage3 and we have a few patches that
>>> won't really make it upstream until stage1 is reopened is it
>>> worthwhile having a new status in the
On 29 November 2011 12:04, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Ramana Radhakrishnan writes:
>> Now that upstream trunk is in stage3 and we have a few patches that
>> won't really make it upstream until stage1 is reopened is it
>> worthwhile having a new status in the merge requests that moves it
>> into a
Ramana Radhakrishnan writes:
> Now that upstream trunk is in stage3 and we have a few patches that
> won't really make it upstream until stage1 is reopened is it
> worthwhile having a new status in the merge requests that moves it
> into a to_upstream status . The other option is to have a common
Hi,
Now that upstream trunk is in stage3 and we have a few patches that
won't really make it upstream until stage1 is reopened is it
worthwhile having a new status in the merge requests that moves it
into a to_upstream status . The other option is to have a common
spreadsheet that we keep updatin
