I could not find that WERROR override code at my kernels...
Sorry delay it, I did make V=1.
There are three kinds test.
All targets are ARM.
All Makefiles(top of kernel tree)-KBUILD_CFLAGS are same.
KBUILD_CFLAGS := -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs \
-fno-stric
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:43:01PM +0700, tknv wrote:
> This issue happend,when I was compiling ARM kernel.
> I could not get it where -Werror gets overriden in tools/perf.
> Could you tell me where is it ?
In tools/perf/Makefile:
34:# Define WERROR=0 to disable treating any warnings as errors.
6
This issue happend,when I was compiling ARM kernel.
I could not get it where -Werror gets overriden in tools/perf.
Could you tell me where is it ?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:53:40PM +, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 02:09:29AM +0700, tknv wrote:
> > Sorry for lacking information.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 02:09:29AM +0700, tknv wrote:
> Sorry for lacking information.
> I would like to explain again.
> When I compile kernel with gcc-4.4.3 and remove Werror from Makefile of
> top of kernel tree, then no warnings to error.
> When using gcc version 4.6.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubu
Sorry for lacking information.
I would like to explain again.
When I compile kernel with gcc-4.4.3 and remove Werror from Makefile of
top of kernel tree, then no warnings to error.
When using gcc version 4.6.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) and also
remove Werror from Makefile of top of kernel tree
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:28:53AM +1300, Michael Hope wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:41:52PM +0700, tknv wrote:
>> >> Thank you very much, quick reply.
>> >> Yes, It is right," i
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:28:53AM +1300, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:41:52PM +0700, tknv wrote:
> >> Thank you very much, quick reply.
> >> Yes, It is right," it may be better to improve the code instead of turning
> >>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:41:52PM +0700, tknv wrote:
>> Thank you very much, quick reply.
>> Yes, It is right," it may be better to improve the code instead of turning
>> of the error check."
>> But this time I would like to testing some modu
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:41:52PM +0700, tknv wrote:
> Thank you very much, quick reply.
> Yes, It is right," it may be better to improve the code instead of turning of
> the error check."
> But this time I would like to testing some modules at first even any
> warnings occur at other modules.
>
Thank you very much, quick reply.
Yes, It is right," it may be better to improve the code instead of turning of
the error check."
But this time I would like to testing some modules at first even any
warnings occur at other modules.
I removed -Werror from Makefile at modules have warnings.
By the w
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 01:54:44PM +0700, tknv wrote:
> Hello,When I compile armel kernel by gcc4.6 on Linux du
> 3.0.0-12-generic-pae #20-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 7 16:37:17 UTC 2011 i686
> i686 i386 GNU/Linux.
> tknv@du:~$ arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=arm-linux-gnueabi
Hello,When I compile armel kernel by gcc4.6 on Linux du
3.0.0-12-generic-pae #20-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 7 16:37:17 UTC 2011 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux.
tknv@du:~$ arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6.1/lto-
12 matches
Mail list logo
