On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 7:38 PM, wrote:
> The whole cross-architecture situation complicates things...in particular
> I'm wondering "which" binutils (host versus target sysroot) we are talking
> about? I'm trying to figure out if the missing binutils is from the armhf
> sysroot or from the x86_64
> > /home/build/linaro/32bit/./gcc/as: line 106: exec: -m: invalid option> >
> exec: usage: exec [-cl] [-a name] [command [arguments ...]] [redirection> >
> ...]
>
> The libgcc config.log is the right one to look at. The error is here,> when
> gcc calls the assembler, the assembler gives an er
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:50 PM, wrote:
> /home/build/linaro/32bit/./gcc/as: line 106: exec: -m: invalid option
> exec: usage: exec [-cl] [-a name] [command [arguments ...]] [redirection
> ...]
The libgcc config.log is the right one to look at. The error is here,
when gcc calls the assembler, t
...
> This is normal. Configure does two link tests when checking for> dlopen. The
> first one is just "gcc conftest.c" and the second one is> "gcc conftest.c
> -dl". It is expected that the first link will fail,> and the second link will
> succeed. The failure of the first link is> ignored beca
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:21 PM, wrote:
> configure:14589: checking for library containing dlopen
> configure:14620: gcc -o conftest -g -O2conftest.c >&5
> /tmp/ccyhVkpp.o: In function `main':
> /home/build/linaro/objdir/libcc1/conftest.c:38: undefined reference to
> `dlopen'
> collect2: e
Hi,
In a previous thread some sysroot issues were resolved, and I am able to build
cross-compilers under gcc-linaro-snapshot-6.1-2016.07 for languages c, c++, and
objc. My sysroot consisted of a loopback mounted dd copy of an Ubuntu 14.04
file system for aarch64. That particular file system ru