Richard,
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 17:12 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> The STT_GNU_IFUNC blueprint:
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Specs/Binutils-STT_GNU_IFUNC
>
> says "the ARM EABI will be updated to support STT_GNU_IFUNC's requirements".
> I suppose the most obvious thi
Loïc Minier writes:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>2. Go ahead and implement it without having the EABI updated.
>> See whether the results are good before deciding whether
>> to bless it in the EABI.
>
> My understanding is that we need to have an implementati
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>2. Go ahead and implement it without having the EABI updated.
> See whether the results are good before deciding whether
> to bless it in the EABI.
My understanding is that we need to have an implementation to be in a
position to re
The STT_GNU_IFUNC blueprint:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Specs/Binutils-STT_GNU_IFUNC
says "the ARM EABI will be updated to support STT_GNU_IFUNC's requirements".
I suppose the most obvious thing that needs to be defined is the relocation
number for R_ARM_IRELATIVE. What's
