Re: Upstream GCC feature freeze

2010-11-09 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia wtorek, 9 listopada 2010 o 00:09:03 Michael Hope napisał(a): > I agree on the approach. I'm concerned about moving over to SVN for a > few reasons: > harder merging (with bzr you do a 'bzr merge lp:gcc' and it does a good, > three way merge with trunk. Last time I used svn for this it was a

Re: Upstream GCC feature freeze

2010-11-08 Thread Michael Hope
I agree on the approach. I'm concerned about moving over to SVN for a few reasons: duplication of accounts (however most of the WG already have or will need sourceware.org accounts), harder merging (with bzr you do a 'bzr merge lp:gcc' and it does a good, three way merge with trunk. Last time I u

Re: Upstream GCC feature freeze

2010-11-08 Thread Ira Rosen
On 8 November 2010 20:30, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > Still, I would like to see a 'linaro-trunk' branch under svn:// > gcc.gnu.org/svn/branches. It would actually serve a different purpose than > a LP branch; the LP GCC 4.6 would probably eventually turn into Linaro 4.6, > while a SVN branch would b

Re: Upstream GCC feature freeze

2010-11-08 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
On 2010/11/8 下午 07:01, Andrew Stubbs wrote: Here's my proposal: * Create a new Launchpad branch for GCC 4.6. * Synchronize this branch with upstream regularly * once per week, perhaps. * Try to get upstream approval for all new patches in the usual way * on the understanding that

Re: Upstream GCC feature freeze

2010-11-08 Thread Richard Sandiford
Mark Mitchell writes: > On 11/8/2010 7:22 AM, Yao Qi wrote: >> In this situation, this LP GCC 4.6 branch can be regarded as our >> upstreams at that moment. >> >>> * Try to get upstream approval for all new patches in the usual way >>>* on the understanding that they won't be applied until s

Re: Upstream GCC feature freeze

2010-11-08 Thread Mark Mitchell
On 11/8/2010 7:22 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > In this situation, this LP GCC 4.6 branch can be regarded as our > upstreams at that moment. > >> * Try to get upstream approval for all new patches in the usual way >>* on the understanding that they won't be applied until stage 1 >>* bug fixes are

Re: Upstream GCC feature freeze

2010-11-08 Thread Yao Qi
On 11/08/2010 07:01 PM, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > Hi all, > > As you may or may not know, upstream GCC has now entered 'stage 3' of > it's development cycle. This will last until spring. > > This means that they are only accepting bug fixes and documentation > improvements. New features and any perf