On 11/09/10 23:03, Michael Hope wrote:
> Oh, I have very unusual needs. I want to use the product I'm working
> on in an after-hours project. CodeSourcery don't provide a Linaro GCC
> 4.5 based toolchain.
There will be a GCC 4.5 based toolchain from CodeSourcery in a month or two.
Of course, th
On 12.09.2010 00:03, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> Have we considered simply referring people to Sourcery G++ Lite Edition?
>>
>> CodeSourcery is already providing zero-cost cross-compilation packages
>> for ARM -- for all of bare-metal, uClinux, an
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Have we considered simply referring people to Sourcery G++ Lite Edition?
>
> CodeSourcery is already providing zero-cost cross-compilation packages
> for ARM -- for all of bare-metal, uClinux, and Linux -- with both
> Windows and Linux hosts.
On 9/11/2010 1:22 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> A wrapper script works fine but I need a way of recompiling libgcc for
>> the Cortex-M series.
Have we considered simply referring people to Sourcery G++ Lite Edition?
CodeSourcery is already providing zero-cost cross-compilation packages
for ARM -- f
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010, Michael Hope wrote:
> A wrapper script works fine but I need a way of recompiling libgcc for
> the Cortex-M series. I'd love to get a arm-none-eabi toolchain
> package out of this that others could use. Could I re-work the cross
> packaging to use newlib and change the confi