Re: Another weird behavior with arm gcc 5.3

2016-04-07 Thread fengwei.yin
Hi Jim, On 2016/4/7 2:39, Jim Wilson wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Jim Wilson wrote: gcc 5.x implements C++ 2011 by default. gcc 4.9.x implements C++ 2003 by default. There were some ABI changes required to implement C++ 2011. If the android loader has knowledge of the gcc C++ ABI,

Re: Another weird behavior with arm gcc 5.3

2016-04-07 Thread fengwei.yin
Hi Christophe, On 2016/4/7 20:14, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 7 April 2016 at 05:44, fengwei.yin wrote: On 2016/4/6 23:11, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 6 April 2016 at 16:53, fengwei.yin wrote: Hi list, I hit another weird problem after use gcc 5.3 (If I use gcc 4.9, there is no any issue) w

Re: Another weird behavior with arm gcc 5.3

2016-04-07 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 7 April 2016 at 05:44, fengwei.yin wrote: > > > On 2016/4/6 23:11, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> >> On 6 April 2016 at 16:53, fengwei.yin wrote: >>> >>> Hi list, >>> I hit another weird problem after use gcc 5.3 (If I use gcc 4.9, there is >>> no >>> any >>> issue) with android. >>> >> >> Hi, >> >

Re: Another weird behavior with arm gcc 5.3

2016-04-06 Thread fengwei.yin
On 2016/4/6 23:11, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 6 April 2016 at 16:53, fengwei.yin wrote: Hi list, I hit another weird problem after use gcc 5.3 (If I use gcc 4.9, there is no any issue) with android. Hi, Maybe this kind of problem would be handled better via bugzilla? With arm gcc 5.3, th

Re: Another weird behavior with arm gcc 5.3

2016-04-06 Thread Jim Wilson
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Jim Wilson wrote: > gcc 5.x implements C++ 2011 by default. gcc 4.9.x implements C++ 2003 > by default. There were some ABI changes required to implement C++ > 2011. If the android loader has knowledge of the gcc C++ ABI, maybe > it needs to be updated to underst

Re: Another weird behavior with arm gcc 5.3

2016-04-06 Thread Jim Wilson
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On 6 April 2016 at 16:53, fengwei.yin wrote: >> With arm gcc 5.3, the C++ apps crash in one class constructor call. And gdb >> shows some vtbl items of the class are not relocated. >> >> With arm gcc 4.9, if set breakpoint in that construct

Re: Another weird behavior with arm gcc 5.3

2016-04-06 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 6 April 2016 at 16:53, fengwei.yin wrote: > Hi list, > I hit another weird problem after use gcc 5.3 (If I use gcc 4.9, there is no > any > issue) with android. > Hi, Maybe this kind of problem would be handled better via bugzilla? > With arm gcc 5.3, the C++ apps crash in one class construc